Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert S Carter Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$80kHealth$73kEnvironment$70kFood & Nutrition$35kYouth Development$30kHuman Services$26kHousing & Shelter$21kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASATCH HOMELESS HEALTH CARE INC$12,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$5,000
UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC$4,000
ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC$3,500
UTAH FOOD BANK$3,000
ARCS FOUNDATION INC UTAH CHAPTER$3,000
CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER$3,000
RURAL UTAH PROJECT EDUCATION FUND$3,000
THE ROAD HOME$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF UTAH COUNTY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$2,000
HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $500 → 11%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $3k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $3k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $3k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $2k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $1k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $1k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $500 → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $500 → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $500 → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $500 → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $200 → 8%ROAD HOME: $1k → 8%ROAD HOME: $1k → 8%ROAD HOME: $500 → 8%ROAD HOME: $500 → 8%ROAD HOME: $200 → 8%RURAL UTAH PROJECT EDUCATION FUND: $3k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $3k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $1k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $1k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $1k → 8%CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $1k → 8%CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $1k → 8%CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $1k → 8%CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $1k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $500 → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $500 → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$324k · 36 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
8

Total granted

$324k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+34%

Still filing today

53%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    Wasatch Homeless Health Care
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +94%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +93%
  • UO
    UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • RB
    RED BUTTE GARDENS
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • YW
    Young Women's Christian Association of Utahgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +39%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
2
Utah Geological Foundation
—
3
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
4
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
5
Utah Public Health Association

The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…

Health
6
Utah Housing Coalition Inc

The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.

—
7
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
8
Rural Housing Development Corporation

To provide quality affordable housing opportunities to individuals and families living in Utah.

Housing & Shelter
9
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
10
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
11
Shelter Providers of Utah

To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.

—
12
Utah Swat Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utahns Against Hunger; the most unlike its peers is Children and Youth Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
22/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $41,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYUTAH FOOD BANK: $17,500 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SALT LAKE AREA: $8,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF UTAH COUNTY INC: $8,000 · OtherUTAHNS AGAINST HUNGER: $7,700 · Other+25 more: $72,617 · Other+25 moreWasatch Homeless Health Care: $58,000 · HealthWasatch Homeless Hea…HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUN…Crossroads Urban Center: $14,500 · Human ServicesCrossroad…THE ROAD HOME: $8,700 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD …CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN …STEWARDSHIP UTAH FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesSTEWARDSH…Neighborhood House Association: $1,200 · Human Services+2 more: $1,200 · Human ServicesUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 · EnvironmentADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC: $3,500 · EnvironmentARCS FOUNDATION INC UTAH CHAPTER: $9,000 · EducationBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $7,000 · EducationUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $8,000 · Arts & CultureSPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC: $8,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$226,817Health$67,000Human Services$32,600Environment$19,500Education$16,000Arts & Culture$8,000Recreation & Sports$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWasatch Homeless Health Care: $58,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $17,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCrossroads Urban Center: $14,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetARCS FOUNDATION INC UTAH CHAPTER: $9,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $8,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SALT LAKE AREA: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF UTAH COUNTY INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUTAHNS AGAINST HUNGER: $7,700 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPY HOP PRODUCTIONS: $5,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIntermountain Therapy Animals: $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Crossroads Urban Center ↗
  • Who funds ARCS FOUNDATION INC UTAH CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SALT LAKE AREA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF UTAH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAHNS AGAINST HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah ↗
  • Who funds SPY HOP PRODUCTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds STEWARDSHIP UTAH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Utah ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT27.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert S Carter Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert S Carter Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert S Carter Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Robert S Carter Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert S Carter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph