Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert L Corkin Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
59
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$335k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$4.6MEducation$3.5MArts & Culture$1.0MAnimals$610kPhilanthropy$484kYouth Development$423kFood & Nutrition$354kReligion$339kOther$0
02FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $360k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $925k
  • $250k+1 grant · $335k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$334,683
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$200,000
INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART$105,000
ZOO NEW ENGLAND$100,000
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
SMART FROM THE START$60,000
THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC$60,000
HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC$50,000
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$50,000
GROTON HILL MUSIC CENTER$50,000
HUDSON CULTURAL ALLIANCE$50,000
VICTORY PROGRAMS$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER$50,000
BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY$40,834
METROWEST BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HUDSON$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $949k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HANGER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%THE TEARS FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%KNOCK KNOCK GIVE A SOCK: $20k → 16%TEARS FOUNDATION: $250 → 9%KNOCK KNOCK GIVE A SOCK: $10k → 16%NEADS: $3k → 11%NEADS: $3k → 11%NEADS: $3k → 11%NEADS: $3k → 11%NEADS: $3k → 11%NEADS: $3k → 11%GATEWAY ARTS: $500 → 7%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC: $50k → 7%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC: $50k → 7%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC: $25k → 7%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC: $17k → 7%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES: $15k → 7%SMART FROM THE START: $60k → 16%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $200 → 8%HORIZON FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $31k → 16%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $30k → 16%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $25k → 16%HORIZON FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $25k → 16%HORIZON FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $25k → 16%NATIONAL CENTER OF AFRO-AMERICAN ARTISTS: $500 → 16%SMART FROM THE START: $79k → 16%SMART FROM THE START: $68k → 16%SMART FROM THE START: $65k → 16%SMART FROM THE START: $64k → 16%SMART FROM THE START: $63k → 16%SMART FROM THE START: $60k → 16%SMART FROM THE START: $60k → 16%JUDGE BAKER CHILDREN'S CENTER: $500 → 16%HUDSON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 8%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $30k → 16%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $30k → 16%HORIZON'S FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 95 repeat orgs$715k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

95 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 52 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
121

Total granted

$11M
$632k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+27%

Still filing today

62%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +69%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $700k · revenue +45%
  • CZ
    COMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $581k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • HU
    HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION
    one grant, 2018 · $210k
  • CN
    CLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +25%
  • BT
    BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $43k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
7
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
10
Northeastern University
Education
11
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
12
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Massachusetts and Rhode Island Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Leslie St Fang Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Food PantriesSchool Parent OrganizationsCancer Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Animal Rescue and ShelterFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr14%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%13%20–35yr14%41%35–55yr14%31%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/139
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,219

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 238 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
125/127
Grantees still filing
96/127
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $801,500 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $700,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $400,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $252,833 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $230,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN CHILDREN'S — $210,000 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION — $210,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC — $194,000 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATED — $175,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC — $226,260 · Other+118 more — $1,746,616 · Other+118 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation — $2,705,350 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporati…VICTORY PROGRAMS INC — $375,000 · HealthVICTORY PROGRAMS INC+17 more — $105,995 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $400,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL — $400,000 · EducationBRIMMER AN…TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $80,000 · EducationTRUSTEES O…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $70,000 · EducationTRUSTEES O…BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $42,500 · Education+11 more — $127,050 · Education+11 moreSMART FROM THE START INC — $517,500 · Human ServicesHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN — $225,750 · Human ServicesHORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC — $156,575 · Human Services+8 more — $48,750 · Human ServicesTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $500,000 · Arts & CultureProject STEP Inc — $130,000 · Arts & CultureGROTON HILL MUSIC INC — $60,000 · Arts & CultureWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $58,500 · Arts & Culture+7 more — $73,379 · Arts & CultureCOMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND — $580,500 · Animals+6 more — $28,889 · AnimalsCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $278,000 · PhilanthropyPROVISION MINISTRY INC — $96,400 · PhilanthropyTHE LESLIE ST FANG FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyHebrew Senior Life Inc — $40,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropySTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC — $20,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$5,146,209Health$3,186,345Education$1,119,550Human Services$948,575Arts & Culture$821,879Animals$609,389Philanthropy$529,400

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $2,705,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $700,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND — $580,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSMART FROM THE START INC — $517,500 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $500,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $400,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL — $400,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetVICTORY PROGRAMS INC — $375,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $278,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $252,833 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $230,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC — $226,260 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN — $225,750 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC — $156,575 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetProject STEP Inc — $130,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROVISION MINISTRY INC — $96,400 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS 4-H FOUNDATION INC — $89,000 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetTHE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION — $86,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LINCOLN-SUDBURY SCHOLARSHIP FUND DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS INC — $80,000 over 8y, 24% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Cultural Alliance Inc — $70,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGROTON HILL MUSIC INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC — $60,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $58,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LESLIE ST FANG FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $42,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKWOOD SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $34,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKNOCK KNOCK GIVE A SOCK — $30,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $28,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS ACTION COMMITTEE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $27,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN NURSERY SCHOOL INC — $23,250 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE — $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC — $21,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOld Methodist Episcopal Church of Berlin Inc dba 19 Carter — $20,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetFILM INDEPENDENT — $17,629 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEADS INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBAHAMAS HURRICANE RESTORATION FUND — $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $13,795 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND ↗
  • Who funds SMART FROM THE START INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Project STEP Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVISION MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS 4-H FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LINCOLN-SUDBURY SCHOLARSHIP FUND DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Hudson Cultural Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds GROTON HILL MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE LESLIE ST FANG FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncEastern Bank Foundati…Analog Devices Founda…American Tower Corpor…Fidelity FoundationRockland Trust Charit…Avidia Charitable Fou…Arbella Insurance Fou…Cambridge Savings Cha…Combined Jewish Phila…Cummings Foundation G…Amelia Peabody Charit…
Boston Foundation IncMA45.1× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Avidia Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert L Corkin Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 280%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Vinfen Corporation — 83% of income from government
  • Victory Programs Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Family Health Center of Worcesterinc — 39% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Judge Baker Children's Center — 29% of income from government
  • Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Straight Ahead Ministries Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
  • Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Silent Spring Institute Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Worcester Symphony Orchestra Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • Hudson Community Food Pantry Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Smart From the Start Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England — 2% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Bentley University — 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Groton Hill Music Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
28get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert L Corkin Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robert L Corkin Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 238 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines