Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Margaret McNamara Foundation 2

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$96k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$114kInternational$92kArts & Culture$82kEducation$65kFood & Nutrition$52kScience & Tech$33kHealth$31kCivil Rights$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$6,010
MARTHA'S TABLE$5,164
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$5,000
THE CARTER CENTER$5,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$5,000
CENTER FOR LAND BASED LEARNING$5,000
REALDING IS FUNDAMENTAL NOVA$5,000
UNHCR$5,000
READING IS FUNDAMENTAL$5,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$4,043
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$3,000
WUNDERGLO FOUNDATION$3,000
NRDC COUNCIL OF 1000$3,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENT LAW CENTER$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW FUTURES: $5k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $2k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $2k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $2k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $2k → 14%CAPITAL CLUBHOUSE: $500 → 14%NEW FUTURES: $2k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$499k · 40 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
17

Total granted

$499k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
-4%

Still filing today

60%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +194%
  • FI
    FEAST Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $25k · revenue +83%
  • CF
    Center for Land-Based Learning
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +238%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAFAYETTE COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +47%
  • DS
    DRUG STRATEGIES
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue -99%
  • K
    KICKSTARTER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
10
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
11
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
12
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Capital Clubhouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
26/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOLA: $62,598 · OtherWOLANEW ENERGY NEXUS: $35,000 · OtherNEW ENERGY NEXUSWETA: $17,000 · OtherWETANRDC COUNCIL OF 1000: $15,300 · OtherNRDC COUNCIL OF 1000HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $14,330 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $14,000 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $11,500 · OtherGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $9,090 · OtherWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $9,000 · Other+31 more: $80,820 · Other+31 moreREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $46,500 · EducationREADING IS FUNDAME…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $33,334 · EducationPresident and Fell…READING IS FUNDAMENTAL OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $5,000 · EducationLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · Education+2 more: $3,000 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $23,010 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …United States Association for UNHCR: $17,000 · InternationalUnited States …THE CARTER CENTER INC: $15,700 · InternationalTHE CARTER CEN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $13,043 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL …HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $5,052 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CATA…Save The Children Federation Inc: $2,750 · InternationalFEAST Inc: $25,000 · Food & NutritionFEAST IncMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $14,459 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S T…CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $13,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AR…Center for Land-Based Learning: $24,792 · EnvironmentCenter fo…CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVAT…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $8,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONME…Grist Magazine Inc: $3,000 · EnvironmentGrist Mag…+2 more: $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE WUNDERGLO FOUNDATION: $16,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,091 · HealthNEW FUTURES: $14,045 · Human ServicesCapital Clubhouse Inc: $500 · Human Services
Other$268,638Education$96,334International$76,555Food & Nutrition$52,459Environment$51,292Health$21,591Human Services$14,545

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $46,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $33,334 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEAST Inc: $25,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning: $24,792 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $23,010 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WUNDERGLO FOUNDATION: $16,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $15,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $14,459 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW FUTURES: $14,045 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $13,043 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $9,090 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8,060 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,091 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $5,052 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRUG STRATEGIES: $4,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrist Magazine Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanary Media Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR YOUTH EMPOWERMENT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCapital Clubhouse Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds FEAST Inc ↗
  • Who funds Center for Land-Based Learning ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds THE WUNDERGLO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DRUG STRATEGIES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Grist Magazine Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Margaret McNamara Foundation 2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Margaret McNamara Foundation 2. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert & Margaret McNamara Foundation 2?

Find your warmest path to Robert & Margaret McNamara Foundation 2 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert & Margaret McNamara Foundation 2’s filings →

More from the funding graph