· Private foundation
ROBERT & BETHANY MILLARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION C/O Graypoint LLC
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $146k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $682k
- $250k+2 grants · $507k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NY Botanical Garden | $253,515 |
| Council on Foreign Relations | $253,370 |
| Kaufman Center | $231,575 |
| American Association of Advancement | $100,000 |
| National Tropical Botanical Garden | $100,000 |
| Kaufman Center | $100,000 |
| Primary Care Transformation Fund | $100,000 |
| Wily Network | $50,000 |
| Council on Foreign Relations | $25,750 |
| Miami Waterkeeper | $25,000 |
| Grand Central Atelier | $25,000 |
| Feltsman Piano Foundation | $25,000 |
| ISLAND COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER | $15,000 |
| Central Park Conservatory | $10,000 |
| New Vision for Public Schools | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $184k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY2× · 2019–2020 · $900k · revenue +44%- COCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC6× · 2018–2024 · $406k · revenue +5%
- GCGRAND CENTRAL ATELIER INC7× · 2018–2024 · $160k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- CFCOMMUNITY FUNDS INCone grant, 2020 · $100k
- AAAmerican Association for the Advancement of Scione grant, 2021 · $100k
- GCGMTO CORPORATIONone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Visions for Public Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND CENTRAL ATELIER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds GMTO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
- Who funds THE LONG NOW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MVYRADIO INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VISIONS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds FROM THE TOP INC ↗
- Who funds BISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ISLANDS COMMUNITY MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds VLADIMIR AND HAEWON FELTSMAN PIANO VLADIMIR & HAEWON FELTSMAN PIANO FO ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Annenberg Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization ROBERT & BETHANY MILLARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION C/O Graypoint LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc — 19% of income from government
- Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- From the Top Inc — 6% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc — 4% of income from government
- American Academy of Arts & Sciences — 3% of income from government
- Peabody Essex Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
- Community Rowing Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc — 2% of income from government
- Friends of Mvyradio Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to ROBERT & BETHANY MILLARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION C/O Graypoint LLC?
Find your warmest path to ROBERT & BETHANY MILLARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION C/O Graypoint LLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.