How much did Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian grant in FY2025?

Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian reported 5 grants totaling $108,885 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian based?

Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian is based in CO.

Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian

To promote understanding and diversity through local and national programming, fundraising and grants for the LGBT+ community, their families, and allies, with a focus on youth education and community action.

$109k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$20k

Largest

01What you fund

0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Human Services$77kHealth$46kCivil Rights$40kArts & Culture$29kEducation$25kYouth Development$6kOther$122k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

bisexual transgenderequalitygender identitycommittedlegal

2022

black transtransgenderlegal

2023

scholarshiptrainingpractical skillssuicideequalitytransgenderlegal

2024

erotictoffartistseducate

2025

lambda legalpractical skillstransgender

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $6k
$10k–50k4 grants · $60k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$281k

Total assets

Largest grants

Lambda Legal$20,000
Cook Inclusive$20,000
Certainty AKA Sus$10,000
Trans Family Support Services$10,000
Andy Zanca Youth Empowerment Program$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$114k · 5 repeat orgs$231k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +241% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$114k

$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+241%

+44%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCivil RightsEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TF
Trans Family Support Services
3× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +885%
TL
Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund Inc
3× · 2019–2023 · $19k · revenue +170%
AF
Aspen Film
4× · 2018–2024 · $19k · revenue +55%

Funded once

TR
The Ryan Perry Foundationgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $103k · revenue +603% · 90% of their budget
FF
Francesco's Foundation
one grant, 2023 · $31k
CC
Connecticut College
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

National Trans Bar Association

Education

Transgender Law Center

Transgender Law Center TLC changes law, policy and attitudes so that all people can live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination regardless of their gender identity or expression.

Civil Rights

Gay Lesbian Bisexual & Transgend

To engage, empower, enrich, and advance the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender community of colorado.

—

Transgender Film Center Ltd

To help trans creators bring finished films to audiences around the world.

Arts & Culture

Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual Transgender Pride-T

To empower every lgbtq+ person to live as their true self. we envision a future where all lgbtq+ people are valued and celebrated for who they are

Civil Rights

Equality Utah Foundation

To secure equal rights and protections for lgbtq utahns and their families.

Civil Rights

Point of Pride

To help transgender and gender diverse people access necessary, life-saving health and wellness services.

Civil Rights

Equality Utah

The organization pursues educational, lobbying, and political activites in otder to further lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (lgtb)interests within utah.

Civil Rights

Advocates for Trans Equality

Advocates for trans equality fights for the legal and political rights of transgender people in america. leveraging decades of experience on the frontlines of power, we shift government and society towards a future where we are no less…

Civil Rights

Gays and Lesbians in a Transgender Society

Services&supportforthelgbtqia+population

—

The Pride Foundation

Pride Foundation connects, inspires and strengthens the Pacific Northwest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in pursuit of equality. They accomplish this in rural and urban areas by awarding grants and scholarships and…

Civil Rights

Funders for Lesbian and Gay Issues Inc

Funders for lgbtq issues educates and organizes funders and supports power-building to create an abundance of resources for the justice and liberation of all queer communities.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Colorado Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Pratt Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

15/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$121,960Human Services$76,576Health$46,402Civil Rights$40,000Arts & Culture$28,500Education$25,000Youth Development$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community FoundationCO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: The Ryan Perry Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~48 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 841768836 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on The Ryan Perry Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 48 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 90% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian?

Find your warmest path to Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian?

More from the funding graph

Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Roaring Fork Gay & Lesbian?

More from the funding graph