How much did RIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of RIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $58k
$10k–50k7 grants · $133k
$50k–250k1 grant · $200k

$8,875

Median grant

States reached

$19M

Total assets

Largest grants

CITIZENS AQUATIC CENTER INC$200,000
JAC CEN DEL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$40,000
BATESVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION$23,500
MARGARET MARY HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
NEW HORIZONS REHABILITATION INC$15,000
NATIONAL MUZZLE LOADING RIFLE ASSOC$14,000
CREATE FOUNDATION INC$10,190
KIDS DISCOVERY FACTORY INC$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S SUPPORT GROUPS OF SOUTHEAST INDIANA$8,875
BATESVILLE MAIN STREET INC$7,608
SERVANTS AT WORK INC$7,392
MILAN COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RELIEF$6,550
RIPLEY COUNTY$6,400
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$6,000
OSGOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 13%. 22% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$783k · 20 repeat orgs$464k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$783k

$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%

+31%

Still filing today

50%

62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NM
NATIONAL MUZZLE LOADING RIFLE ASSOC
7× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +54%
CF
CREATE FOUNDATION INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $77k · revenue +134%
SI
SOUTHEAST INDIANA HEALTH CENTER
2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +17%

Funded once

MS
MAIN STREET VERSAILLES
one grant, 2022 · $25k
JS
JAC-CEN-DEL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $20k
SI
SOUTHEASTERN IN MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOC
one grant, 2022 · $13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Baxter County Regional Hospital Inc

Baxter health's mission is to provide compassionate care beyond measure.

Health

Lingleville Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Rural volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster

Burnsville Volunteer Fire Department

Burnsville vfd provides fire protection, safty, and rescue service

Public Safety & Disaster

Batavia Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer firefighter association

Public Safety & Disaster

Raleigh Fire Department Inc

Provide fire and EMS services to all or part of 5 townships in Rush Co. IN

—

Indiana Regional Medical Center

To serve the healthcare needs of every life we touch with compassion, respect, and dignity.

Health

Harrison Township Volunteer Fire Co

To provide firefighting services to residents of harrison township in bartholomew county, indiana.

—

Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

Mathias-Baker Volunteer Fire Company

To provide emergency volunteer firefighting services to the mathias-baker area of hardy county, wv

Public Safety & Disaster

Baskett Community Fire Department

Volunteer fire department serving the baskett, ky area.

Public Safety & Disaster

Adams Twp Volunteer Fire Dept

Provide fire protection and fire prevention training for adams and clinton township of decatur county indiana.

Public Safety & Disaster

Lacrosse Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Provide fire protection services for the residents and businesses of lacrosse, indiana and dewey township

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Margaret Mary Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Xavier University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 22% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/50

the rest of the field

12/208

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/30

Grantees still filing

22/30

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$711,502Recreation & Sports$279,535Health$88,433Philanthropy$82,430Arts & Culture$35,600Human Services$34,242Education$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Frederick W and Jolene EdmundsIN20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Frederick W and Jolene Edmunds · Civista Charitable Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Baxter International Foundation · John A Hillenbrand Foundation Inc · William A & Marth H Hillenbrand · First Financial Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GIBSON THEATRE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 451298135 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GIBSON THEATRE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 37% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Ripley County Community Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ripley County Community Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ripley County Community Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

RIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ripley County Community Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph