· Private foundation
Civista Charitable Foundation Fka Ucb Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of CIVISTA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION FKA UCB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k82 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEARBORN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO | $20,000 |
| ST ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER INC | $13,000 |
| MAIN STREET AURORA | $10,000 |
| CAC OF SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA | $6,000 |
| A COMMUNITY BRIDGE INC | $5,600 |
| LAWRENCEBURG MAIN STREET | $5,500 |
| ST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $5,500 |
| CITY OF AURORA | $5,500 |
| JAC CEN DEL HIGH SCHOOL | $3,600 |
| SOUTH DEARBORN HIGH SCHOOL | $3,050 |
| IVY TECH FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| ALL SAINTS PARISH | $3,000 |
| DEARBORN COUNTY 4-H | $2,700 |
| MILAN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS | $2,650 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,620 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
108 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA4× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +74%
- ITIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC5× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +208%
- LMLAWRENCEBURG MAIN STREET INC4× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $15k
- HPHIGH POINT HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $13k
- SISOUTHEASTERN INDIANA HONOR GUARDone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promote development in Perry County, Indiana
An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.
Conduct annual county fair
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Icv ensures indiana's elected officials are accountable to hoosiers who all deserve clean energy, clean water and clean air.
Provide volunteer fire protection to the cummunity of dunkirk, indiana.
The muncie sports commission exists to attract, create, host, and support sporting events and recreational opportunities for delaware county, indiana.
By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.
Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
Volunteer fire department
Promote and educate indiana residents on the state's economic success and positive gains.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Special Olympics Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lawrenceburg Greendale Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 219 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAIN STREET AURORA INC ↗
- Who funds DEARBORN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA ↗
- Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCEBURG MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds HILLFOREST HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEARBORN COUNTY CLEARING HOUSE FOR EMERGENCY AID INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC ↗
- Who funds LAURENS FIGHT FOR CURE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Indiana Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MARGARET MARY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ENCOURAGEMENT SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dearborn Community Foundation Inc · Ripley County Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · PFS Community Foundation · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Lilly Endowment Inc · Indiana Humanities Council Inc · The Chester & Ruth Baylor Family Foundation · The Frederick W and Jolene Edmunds Rockwood Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Switzerland County Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Civista Charitable Foundation Fka Ucb Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Civista Charitable Foundation Fka Ucb Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Civista Charitable Foundation Fka Ucb Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.