· Private foundation
Riggs Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA | $5,000 |
| EMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS | $5,000 |
| FOUNDERS GARDEN CLUB OF DALLAS | $5,000 |
| COMMIT PARTNERSHIP | $2,500 |
| TEXAS2036 | $2,000 |
| NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK | $1,000 |
| ST PHILLIPS SCHOOL & COMMUNITY CTR | $1,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FDN | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| SENIOR SOURCE | $500 |
| NORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION | $500 |
| MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INST | $250 |
| TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $250 |
| FAMILY PLACE | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS6× · 2018–2024 · $31k · revenue +11%
- SMSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +163%
- NDNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC2× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- NPNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +378%
- TSTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDRENone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +20%
- TFTeach for America DFWone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), to encourage broad-based public support of the healthcare system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
To build and maintain donor relationships in order to raise, manage, and distribute funds to assist Methodist Health System in acquiring state-of-the-art technology, attracting excellent medical staff, and supporting vital hospital…
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.
Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Del Monte Forest Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
- Who funds Texas 2036 ↗
- Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
- Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FOUNDERS GARDEN CLUB OF DALLAS ↗
- Who funds CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Woodall Rodgers Park Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BLAIR HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds DALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds UNITED TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MERCY STREET ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Kline Family Foundation · The Hoak Foundation · The Perot Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Rowling Foundation · The Hoglund Foundation · The Bill & Katie Weaver Charitable Trust · Perkins-Prothro Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Riggs Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Riggs Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Riggs Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.