Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY (California) is funded by 19 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $112,100 in grants to it, the largest being THE TAPPAN FOUNDATION ($25,000). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY's revenue fell 16% between 2017 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,244 unclassified nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$6k from 5 funders in 2024, up from $9k and 5 in 2017.
3 of 19 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 32% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 44% · 2018 71% · 2019 47% · 2020 32% · 2021 33% · 2022 61% · 2023 55% · 2024 42% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
33% of DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 74% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY is locally rooted: 60% of its grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 19 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 19funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing