Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richmon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$263kArts & Culture$210kCivil Rights$101kReligion$95kHealth$55kEnvironment$48kHuman Services$44kAnimals$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k51 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$500
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oakland Symphony$30,000
Face the Future$15,000
Operation Rainbow$15,000
Temple Sinai$10,000
Antidefamation League$9,000
ACLU$7,250
Chronicle Season of Sharing$5,000
Alameda County Community Food Bank$5,000
Angel Fund at Pender Vet$4,500
The Carter Center$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Stand Up For Kids$4,000
Woodwell Climate Research Center$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Southern Poverty Law Center$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Good Plus Foundation: $500 → 17%Good Plus Foundation: $500 → 17%Up Together: $4k → 10%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%Reproductive Freedom For All: $500 → 14%Reproductive Freedom For All: $500 → 14%World Food Program USA: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$853k · 62 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

62 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
39

Total granted

$853k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+23%

Still filing today

61%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsCivil RightsHuman ServicesEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    OPERATION RAINBOW INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +21%
  • EB
    EAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $145k · revenue +120%
  • CS
    CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FIRST HEBREW CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IR
    INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
11
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
12
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Reading Is Fundamental Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/59
Grantees still filing
38/59
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERATION RAINBOW INC: $190,000 · OtherOPERATION RAINBOW INCTemple Sinai: $68,625 · OtherTemple SinaiIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientACLU: $39,000 · OtherACLUALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $23,000 · Other+68 more: $227,860 · Other+68 moreEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY: $145,000 · Arts & CultureEAST BAY PERFORMI…+2 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $16,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $14,000 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $12,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $8,050 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $4,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $3,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $3,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 · International+4 more: $2,000 · InternationalCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $40,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $23,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $14,500 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $1,500 · Civil Rights+3 more: $1,750 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $16,500 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC: $8,000 · Crime & LegalVIOLENCE POLICY CENTER: $4,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $1,250 · Crime & LegalANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $14,500 · AnimalsCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $6,500 · AnimalsPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 · Animals+4 more: $1,500 · Animals
Other$608,485Arts & Culture$147,500International$65,550Food & Nutrition$44,000Civil Rights$40,750Crime & Legal$29,750Animals$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION RAINBOW INC: $190,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY: $145,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $14,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $8,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStandUp for Kids: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIOLENCE POLICY CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFII - NATIONAL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MARIN COUNTY: $900 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BOSTON: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION RAINBOW INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds StandUp for Kids ↗
  • Who funds Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richmon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richmon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Justice Resource Institute Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Animal Rescue League of Boston: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richmon Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph