Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Richman Family Foundation Inc

See schedule othe foundation was created to carry out the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the associated jewish community federation of baltimore, inc.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$486k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$8.2MPhilanthropy$2.1MRecreation & Sports$1.4MHealth$1.0MArts & Culture$494kHuman Services$457kEnvironment$450kYouth Development$296kOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 57 grants below total $3,767,946 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,869,613 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $101,667 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k39 grants · $777k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.3M
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$486,379
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION$300,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$300,000
THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE$250,000
THE LOYOLA SCHOOL$201,667
FOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR YOUNG WOMEN$200,000
MOUNT SAINT JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL INC$200,000
THE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE$161,000
PIVOT INC$150,000
DREAM BIG FOUNDATION$150,000
IMPROVING EDUCATION$120,000
BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$120,000
FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE$80,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION$72,000
SHAREBABY INC$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $18k → 22%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 22%MARYLAND STATE CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $20k → 6%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK: $20k → 19%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK: $30k → 19%ROBERTA'S HOUSE: $10k → 19%MARIPOSA EDUCATION: $21k → 19%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE: $20k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $25k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $25k → 19%LITTLE FLOWERS CHILDHOOD AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 19%MARIPOSA EDUCATION: $17k → 19%LITTLE FLOWERS CHILDHOOD AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $17k → 19%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE: $12k → 19%LITTLE FLOWERS CHILDHOOD AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $12k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
MD
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 34 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
14

Total granted

$14M
$324k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+21%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $854k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +42%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +22%
  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • LH
    LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +21%
  • THE LITERACY LAB
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -73%
  • BB
    Backyard Basecamp Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue -97%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baltimore Corps Inc

To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…

Employment
2
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
3
The Maryland School for the Blind

As a statewide resource center, the school provides outreach, educational and residential services for students to reach their fullest potential by preparing them to be as successful, independent, and well-rounded contributing members of…

Education
4
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
5
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
6
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
7
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
8
Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc

The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.

Social Science
9
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Baltimore Leadership School for Young Women and the most unlike its peers is Nature Sacred. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts CentersHospital Systems and SupportLegal Services & AdvocacyEarly Childhood & Youth Car…Disability Support ServicesHospital Systems and Health…Youth Sports ProgramsSenior Affordable HousingResidential Recovery & Shel…Youth Development ProgramsChesapeake Bay Conservation…Baltimore Charter SchoolsPerforming Arts Organizatio…Union Benefit PlansProfessional & Industry Ass…Member Social Clubs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr15%10%5–10yr17%20%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr12%17%35–55yr20%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr15%4%5–10yr17%7%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr20%57%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/78
the rest of the field
14%
1,954/14,407

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/72
Grantees still filing
40/72
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $3,721,598 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $1,450,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $1,400,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $624,008 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INCTHE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC — $578,000 · EducationTHE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INCFOUNDATION FOR THE BALTIMORE LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR YOUNG WOMEN — $400,000 · Education+13 more — $828,629 · Education+13 moreTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $1,556,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ASSOCIATED …ASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE — $480,000 · PhilanthropyASSOCIATED JEWI…+2 more — $60,000 · PhilanthropyMercy Health Foundation — $600,000 · HealthMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — $150,000 · HealthLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC — $100,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND INC — $40,000 · HealthMARYLAND CITIZENS' HEALTH INITIATIVE EDUCATION FUND INC — $40,000 · Health+2 more — $37,650 · HealthMOUNT SAINT JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL INC — $400,000 · OtherMOUNT SAINT JO…THE LOYOLA SCHOOL INC — $243,167 · OtherTHE LOYOLA SCH…CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL — $82,500 · OtherNEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION INC — $210,000 · OtherNEXT ONE UP FO…PIVOT INC — $150,000 · OtherPIVOT INCDREAM BIG FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · OtherDREAM BIG FOUN…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $138,000 · OtherAMERICAN JEWIS…J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC — $102,500 · Other+20 more — $515,719 · Other+20 moreBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $400,000 · Arts & CultureSHAREBABY INC — $70,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MARYLAND BOOK BANK INC — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $73,500 · Arts & CultureCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $410,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC — $20,000 · Environment+1 more — $10,000 · EnvironmentLITTLE FLOWERS EARLY CHILDHOOD AND DEVELOPMENT CEN — $53,041 · Human ServicesMARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesMARIPOSA CHILD SUCCESS PROGRAMS INC — $37,900 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC — $31,500 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE — $27,500 · Human ServicesMARYLAND STATE CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesROBERTA'S HOUSE INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Education$9,002,235Philanthropy$2,096,000Health$967,650Other$1,991,886Arts & Culture$563,500Environment$440,000Human Services$279,941

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $3,721,598 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $1,556,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $1,450,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $1,400,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $624,008 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMercy Health Foundation — $600,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC — $578,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE — $480,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $410,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $400,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE BALTIMORE LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR YOUNG WOMEN — $400,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetNEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION INC — $210,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetFUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $190,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetIMPROVING EDUCATION INC — $165,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetPIVOT INC — $150,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDREAM BIG FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $138,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH STUDIES INC — $125,396 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC — $102,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBALTIMORE CURRICULUM PROJECT INC — $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES BALTIMORE INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHAREBABY INC — $70,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE FLOWERS EARLY CHILDHOOD AND DEVELOPMENT CEN — $53,041 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FAMILY TREE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LITERACY LAB — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMARYLAND CITIZENS' HEALTH INITIATIVE EDUCATION FUND INC — $40,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetROCA INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARIPOSA CHILD SUCCESS PROGRAMS INC — $37,900 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetMARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK — $37,410 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC — $31,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOVEABLE FEAST INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBackyard Basecamp Inc — $28,233 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE — $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHAPTER ONE NFP — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARENTCHILD INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAsylee Women Enterprise Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Midtown Academy Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community F…Associated Jewish Cha…The Abell Foundation …The Morris Goldseker …Annie E Casey Foundat…Sherman Family Founda…France-Merrick Founda…The Harry and Jeanett…The United Way of Cen…Fund for Educational …T Rowe Price Program …David & Barbara B Hir…
Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD78.8× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Abell Foundation Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Sherman Family Foundation · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Richman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
  • Maryland Family Network Inc — 66% of income from government
  • St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Asylee Women Enterprise Inc — 26% of income from government
  • Baltimore Squashwise Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Roberta's House Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Little Flowers Early Childhood and Development Cen — 17% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
  • The Family Tree Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Pro Bono Counseling Project Inc — 8% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Wide Angle Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Health Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Center for Hope Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Arts for Learning Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richman Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Richman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines