Skip to content
Richard T & Marianne H Walsh Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Richard T & Marianne H Walsh Charitable Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$22kHealth$18kPublic Benefit$3kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHousing & Shelter$1kInternational$1kEmployment$700Other$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$200
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Hugo of the Hills Parish$18,000
Rose Hill Foundation$2,080
St John the Evangelist Church$1,100
Walsh Research Institute$1,000
Walsh College Foundation$1,000
Sacred Heart Major Seminary$500
Pathways to Work$500
Individual grant recipient$350
Center for the Homeless$305
Holy Cross Village Foundation$300
The Leadership Institute$300
Judicial Watch$200
Capuchin Soup Kitchen$200
Beacon Health Foundation$200
Catholic Faith Appeal$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Arizona Autism United: $100 → 11%Deo Gratias Ministries: $100 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 27 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
9

Total granted

$46k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+12%

Still filing today

67%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Beacon Health Foundation Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +183%
  • PD
    PUENTE DESARROLLO INTERNACIONAL
    2× · 2021–2023 · $1k · revenue +116%
  • GH
    GUEST HOUSE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $800 · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CC
    Cardinal Club
    one grant, 2022 · $536
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $200 · revenue +1%
  • SV
    St Vincent de Paul
    one grant, 2022 · $125
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
2
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
6
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
7
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
R Street Institute

The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…

Education
10
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kids Without Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Hugo of the Hills Parish: $18,140 · OtherSt Hugo of the Hills ParishSt John the Evangelist Church: $1,900 · OtherSt John the Evangelist Church+22 more: $7,216 · Other+22 moreROSE HILL CENTER INC: $5,200 · HealthROSE HILL CENTER INCBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $1,800 · HealthBeacon Health Founda…WALSH RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,000 · HealthWALSH RESEARCH INSTI…GUEST HOUSE INC: $800 · HealthGUEST HOUSE INC+2 more: $350 · HealthROSE HILL FOUNDATION: $8,560 · PhilanthropyROSE HILL FOUNDATI…Leadership Institute: $1,200 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $685 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $400 · Public BenefitTHE WALSH COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $200 · EducationConservative Partnership Institute: $175 · EducationEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $100 · EducationPUENTE DESARROLLO INTERNACIONAL: $1,200 · Human ServicesARIZONA AUTISM UNITED INC: $100 · Human ServicesDEO GRATIAS MINISTRIES DETROIT: $100 · Human ServicesGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $600 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $600 · Food & Nutrition
Other$27,256Health$9,150Philanthropy$8,560Public Benefit$2,285Education$1,475Human Services$1,400Food & Nutrition$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROSE HILL FOUNDATION: $8,560 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetROSE HILL CENTER INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeacon Health Foundation Inc: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPUENTE DESARROLLO INTERNACIONAL: $1,200 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WALSH COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWALSH RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGUEST HOUSE INC: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $685 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAY TO WORK: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHoly Cross Village Foundation Inc: $550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $505 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKids Without Cancer: $300 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute: $175 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA AUTISM UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEO GRATIAS MINISTRIES DETROIT: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HORIZONS REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDYSPHONIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University of Notre D…The Bank of America C…Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Network for GoodNatl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
University of Notre Dame du LacIN15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University of Notre Dame du Lac · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard T & Marianne H Walsh Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard T & Marianne H Walsh Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard T & Marianne H Walsh Charitable Tr?

    Find your warmest path to Richard T & Marianne H Walsh Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard T & Marianne H Walsh Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home