Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard Rex Ponn Trust Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Richard Rex Ponn Trust Fund’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Columbus Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Richard Rex Ponn Trust Fund named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $18k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’20
9
’21
12
’22
10
’23
10
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$41kReligion$7kEducation$6kArts & Culture$6kHealth$5kHousing & Shelter$4kScience & Tech$4kCrime & Legal$300Other$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,100
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER$1,500
MESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,200
BARELY USED PETS$1,100
PRIMATE RESCUE CENTER$1,100
OHIO ALLEYCAT RESOURCE & SPAY$1,100
LOVE OF PAWS INC$1,100
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,100
MENIFEE ANIMAL SHELTER$1,100
GALLUDET UNIVERSITY$1,100
PET PROMISE$1,100
CAT WELFARE ASSOCIATION$1,100
Individual grant recipient$1,100
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE$1,100
HUMANE SOCIETY OF RICHMOND$1,100
URBANA MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%APOPO US INC: $2k → 14%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $300 → 5%APOPO US INC: $900 → 14%APOPO US INC: $900 → 14%APOPO US INC: $700 → 14%APOPO US INC: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 23 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$84k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+34%

Still filing today

43%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +5%
  • TC
    THE CAT WELFARE ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +156%
  • BU
    Barely Used Pets Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHAMPAIGN COUNTY YOUTH CHOIR
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • UH
    URBANA HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • CA
    CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Cares for Cats
—
2
Champaign County Humane Association

The champaign county humane association owns and operates the paws animal shelter. the mission is to provide food and shelter to abandoned and strayed animals.

Animals
3
Companion Pet Rescue & Transport of West Tn Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate, and re-home companion animals, and provide necessary medical care for these animals, including spaying/neuturing by a veterinary professional, in accordance with the laws of the state

Animals
4
Columbus Pet Rescue

Rescue and adoption of animals

Animals
5
Lexington Humane Society

To advocate the compassionate treatment of animals; educate the community on responsible, lifelong pet ownership; and promote adoption as the best option when searching for a new pet.

Animals
6
Carolina Tiger Rescue

Carolina tiger rescue's mission is saving and protecting wildcats in captivity and in the wild.

Animals
7
Champaign Area Trap Spay Neuter and Adoption Program (Catsnap)

Reduce pet overpopulation and welfare through adoption programs and spay/neuter assistance

Animals
8
Critter Cavalry Rescue

To provide adopted pet families for abandoned and neglected animals from the middle tennessee area throughout the eastern and northeastern united states.

Animals
9
Pets Without Parents Columbus

To be a resource as a no-kill pet rescue service

Animals
10
Caloosa Humane Society Inc

The mission of Caloosa Humane Society is to serve, shelter, and protect the homeless pets in our care. We are dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive homes for our companion animals in need. Our no-kill facility provides low…

Education
11
Humane Society of the Tennessee Valley Inc

Humane society of the tennessee valley, inc. is dedicated to providing lifesaving programs and resources to enrich the lives of people and companion animals in the communities we serve.

Animals
12
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Appalachian Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lexington Leadership Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $337,116 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBUS FOUNDATIONMESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $6,100 · OtherMESSIAH LUTHER…LEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC: $5,900 · OtherLEXINGTON HEAR…Individual grant recipient: $5,300 · OtherIndividual gra…MENIFEE ANIMAL SHELTER: $4,900 · OtherMENIFEE ANIMAL…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HU…WYANDOT HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,500 · OtherWYANDOT HUMANE…Individual grant recipient: $3,200 · OtherIndividual gra…CHAMPAIGN COUNTY YOUTH CHOIR: $3,000 · OtherCHAMPAIGN COUN…CHAMPAIGN COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE: $2,700 · OtherLOVE OF PAWS INC: $2,700 · OtherOHIO ALLEYCAT RESOURCE & SPAY: $2,700 · OtherOHIO ALLEYCAT RESOURCE & SPAY NEUTER: $2,600 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY RICHMOND: $2,500 · Other+5 more: $5,100 · Other+5 moreTHE CAT WELFARE ASSOCIATION: $5,300 · AnimalsBarely Used Pets Inc: $5,300 · AnimalsPRIMATE RESCUE CENTER: $5,200 · AnimalsPET PROMISE: $4,600 · AnimalsCHAMPAIGN COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC: $2,400 · AnimalsAPOPO US INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC: $300 · Human ServicesGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $4,300 · EducationLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $2,700 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY: $500 · Arts & CultureBLUEGRASS CRIME STOPPERS INC: $500 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$337,116Other$54,700Animals$22,800Human Services$5,800Education$4,300Arts & Culture$3,200Crime & Legal$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC: $5,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAT WELFARE ASSOCIATION: $5,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBarely Used Pets Inc: $5,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPRIMATE RESCUE CENTER: $5,200 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPET PROMISE: $4,600 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetAPOPO US INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGALLAUDET UNIVERSITY: $4,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $2,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPAIGN COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC: $2,400 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEGRASS CRIME STOPPERS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CAT WELFARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Barely Used Pets Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRIMATE RESCUE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PET PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds APOPO US INC ↗
  • Who funds GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds BLUEGRASS CRIME STOPPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard Rex Ponn Trust Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard Rex Ponn Trust Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard Rex Ponn Trust Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Richard Rex Ponn Trust Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard Rex Ponn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph