Skip to content
Richard P Dulaney Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Richard P Dulaney Foundation Inc

$1k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$36kReligion$10kHuman Services$4kEducation$2kAnimals$1kRecreation & Sports$700Youth Development$600Public Benefit$400Other$0
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTS COUNCIL OF OKC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $900) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%SKYWATCH TV: $250 → 13%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%SKYWATCH TV: $200 → 13%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $200 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
OR
NJ
CA
NE
MO
MD
TN
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$49k · 20 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
26

Total granted

$49k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+17%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationReligionHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +36%
  • THE URBAN MISSION INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +7%
  • SR
    SOUTHWEST RADIO CHURCH OF THE AIR
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BF
    BEST FRIENDS OF PETS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -100%
  • SR
    SOUTHWEST RADIO CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $700
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -124%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
2
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
3
Believer's International Inc

Christian publishing company

—
4
Plain Truth Ministries Worldwide

Ptm worldwide publishes christianity without the religion magazine and plain truth magazine. ptm further serves with daily radio programs, blogs, bible surveys and many other free inspirational resources on its website, www.ptm.org

Religion
5
The Oklahoma United Methodist Foundation

To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.

—
6
Eyewitness Bible Series Inc

Acquire, archive and stream religious sermons over the internet at www.sermon.net and websites of other 501(c)(3) religious organizations.

Religion
7
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Kmoc Fm

Religious broadcasting

—
9
Oklahoma Catholic Broadcasting Inc

To provide Catholic education and reflection through radio broadcasting of Roman Catholic Theology programming

Arts & Culture
10
Jim King Ministries Inc

Proclaim the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
11
Gospel Revivals Inc

To engage in christian evangelism through the publication and worldwide distribution of "herald of his coming" periodical

—
12
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OKLAHOMA CITY REPRETORY THEATRE: $25,800 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY REPRETORY THEATREARTS COUNCIL OF OKC: $6,500 · OtherARTS COUNCIL OF OKCALLIED ARTS OKC: $2,500 · OtherTHE URBAN MISSION INC: $2,350 · Other+28 more: $10,460 · Other+28 moreLIFE ACTION MINISTRIES: $2,400 · ReligionSOUTHWEST RADIO CHURCH OF THE AIR: $1,000 · ReligionPROPHECY WATCHERS INC: $550 · ReligionTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $500 · EducationYukon Quarterback Club: $200 · Education+1 more: $25 · EducationSKYWATCH TV CORPORATION: $450 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $250 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $200 · Human ServicesJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $300 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $100 · Public BenefitNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $300 · Recreation & SportsCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $250 · Health
Other$47,610Religion$3,950Education$1,725Human Services$900Public Benefit$400Recreation & Sports$300Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFE ACTION MINISTRIES: $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN MISSION INC: $2,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROPHECY IN THE NEWS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS OF PETS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNOVO MINISTRIES INC: $950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBerean Call: $710 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOLIVE TREE MINISTRIES: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROPHECY WATCHERS INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKYWATCH TV CORPORATION: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYukon Quarterback Club: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…The Merrick FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…Servant FoundationNatl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard P Dulaney Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard P Dulaney Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    9get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard P Dulaney’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home