· Private foundation
Richard & Marianne Reinisch Foundation Foundation - C/O Marianne Reinisch
Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k21 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ORGANIC HEALTH RESPONSE | $50,000 |
| CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| COLORADO OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE | $25,000 |
| JEWISH UNITED FUND | $15,000 |
| GILDA'S CLUB S FLORIDA | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF IL FOUNDATI | $5,000 |
| NORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL | $4,115 |
| GLENWOOD SPRINGS CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $3,500 |
| NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK | $3,000 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $3,000 |
| NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH | $2,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| LAMBS FARM | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2020, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VVVALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +27%
- JUJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO4× · 2017–2020 · $80k · revenue +13%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- COCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTSone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -24%
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSSone grant, 2019 · $10k
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +98%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home & Aid Society of Ill and the most unlike its peers is Organic Health Response Incorporated Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ORGANIC HEALTH RESPONSE INCORPORATED USA ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds GLENWOOD SPRINGS CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAMBS FARM INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds URBAN GATEWAYS ↗
- Who funds Jewish Community Centers of Chicago ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Richard & Marianne Reinisch Foundation Foundation - C/O Marianne Reinisch funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.