Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard J and Linda J Sieracki Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$580kFood & Nutrition$160kReligion$116kPhilanthropy$39kHealth$36kCivil Rights$15kHousing & Shelter$13kInternational$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$975
Median grant
8
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Greater Chicago Food Depository$17,500
McCormick Foundation$8,000
St Mary's Food Bank$8,000
Planned Parenthood$6,000
Chicago Sinai Congregation$5,040
Holy Name Cathedral$5,000
Annual Catholic Appeal$4,500
No Kid Hungry$2,500
The Nature Conservancy$1,118
DePaul University$1,000
USGA$1,000
Habitat For Humanity$1,000
Kanter Morgan Foundation$975
St Patricks Catholic Church$750
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $500 → 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $500 → 9%Hospice of the Calumet Area: $100 → 15%Metropolitan Family Services: $250 → 14%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $500 → 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $250 → 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $200 → 9%The Honeycomb Project: $300 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$989k · 45 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
34

Total granted

$989k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+7%

Still filing today

36%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $322k · revenue +127%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $165k · revenue +15%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • MA
    MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -43%
  • CA
    CHICAGO ABORTION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +602%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
2
Chicago Cares Inc

Chicago Cares, Inc. mobilizes volunteers to build a stronger, more unified Chicago.

Community Improvement
3
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
4
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
5
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
6
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
7
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
8
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…

—
9
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
10
University of Chicago Cancer Research Foundation

The mission shall be to provide fundraising, advocacy, and advisory support for cancer research at the comprehensive cancer center at the university of chicago.

Health
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robert R Mccormick Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/41
Grantees still filing
25/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Illinois Foundation: $321,500 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $165,214 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY+3 more: $1,103 · EducationMt Carmel High School: $91,475 · OtherMt Carmel High SchoolTemple Anshe Sholom: $55,535 · OtherTemple Anshe SholomHOLY NAME CATHEDRAL: $48,825 · OtherHOLY NAME CATHEDRALTo Teach Who Christ Is: $30,000 · OtherTo Teach Who Christ IsAnnual Catholic Appeal: $25,000 · OtherAnnual Catholic AppealPlanned Parenthood: $21,500 · OtherPlanned Parenthood+64 more: $92,459 · Other+64 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $120,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO …ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $36,900 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD B…+1 more: $1,001 · Food & NutritionROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Philanthropy+2 more: $600 · PhilanthropyPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $2,500 · International+1 more: $250 · InternationalCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $8,100 · Housing & ShelterMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $7,500 · Civil Rights
Education$487,817Other$364,794Food & Nutrition$157,901Philanthropy$31,850International$8,750Housing & Shelter$8,100Civil Rights$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $321,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $165,214 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $36,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $8,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKinder Morgan Foundation: $5,145 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,618 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESTWICK COUNTRY CLUB: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR JEWISH WOMEN CHICAGO NORTH SHORE SECTION: $600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHT FUNDS FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Youth Centers: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL'S ALL-STAR ANGEL FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWITCO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO VETERANS: $105 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENGINEERS IN ACTION INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Sport Chicago: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANE TECH BASKETBALL BOOSTERS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Kinder Morgan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds Role Model Movement Inc (NFP) ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL16.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard J and Linda J Sieracki Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard J and Linda J Sieracki Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard J and Linda J Sieracki’s filings →

More from the funding graph