Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard & Melissa Mark Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$126k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Religion$235kPhilanthropy$55kYouth Development$42kHealth$16kRecreation & Sports$15kEducation$15kPublic Benefit$11kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $126k
$5,051
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CATHEDRAL BASILICA OF ST LOUIS$126,000
JACKIE JOYNER-KERSEE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$35,000
ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL$26,000
LINCOLN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL$7,500
GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,051
MINDSEYES$5,000
MADISON COUNTY FALLEN OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND$5,000
GATEWAY PET GUARDIANS$2,500
KENNETH GLENMORE SOCIETY$2,500
DIGNITY PERIOD$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
CA
MO
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$264k · 6 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$264k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

50%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsCivil RightsHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CATHEDRAL BASILICA OF ST LOUIS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $179k
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $52k
  • GA
    GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • JF
    JJK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • LF
    LIGHTHOUSE FOR BOYS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • AR
    ARCHBISHOP ROBERT J CARLSON ADOPTION GRANT
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
3
The Animal Mission

To promote affordable and accessible spay and neuter services to midlands pet owners and support municipal shelters through intake diversion programs.

Animals
4
Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan

We honor life through donation.

—
5
Donate Life Foundation

To improve the quality of life for people affected by organ and tissue donation and transplantation. to transform our community by eliminating the waiting list for organ and tissue transplants.

Health
6
Alliance for Contraception in Cats & Dogs

ACC&D's mission is to advance non-surgical sterilants and contraceptives for cats and dogs and to promote their global accessibility. We envision a world in which dog and cat populations are effectively and humanely managed, improving the…

Animals
7
Hawaii Organ Procurement Organization

The mission of legacy of life hawai'i is to save and enhance lives through recovering organs and tissue for transplant; encourage organ donation through community outreach and education; and honor and support organ donors and their families

Health
8
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
9
Power to Decide

Power to decide envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. its mission is to advance…

Human Services
10
St Louis Metropolitan Spay Neuter and Wellness Center Inc

1.) provide low cost, subsidized or free spay/neuter surgeries for cats and dogs, including transportation services, 2.) provide wellness services for cats and dogs, and 3.) provide educational services regarding health and welfare of cats…

Animals
11
United Planning Organization

United planning organization's mission is uniting people with opportunities.

Human Services
12
Washington Dc Police Foundation

The mission of the washington dc police foundation is to bring together business, professional, civic and nonprofit organizations and individual citizens to promote public safety by providing financial and in-kind resources to the chief of…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gateway Arch Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHEDRAL BASILICA OF ST LOUIS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $178,500 · OtherCATHEDRAL BASILICA OF ST LOUIS CATHOLIC CHURCHARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $52,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUISJJK FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherJJK FOUNDATIONJACKIE JOYNER-KERSEE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $35,000 · OtherJACKIE JOYNER-KERSEE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB+12 more: $56,051 · Other+12 moreLINCOLN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL: $9,500 · EducationCOLLINSVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationGATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMADISON COUNTY FALLEN OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND: $5,000 · Arts & CultureA Beacon of Light Pregnancy Help Center: $4,000 · Civil RightsGATEWAY PET GUARDIANS: $3,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $500 · AnimalsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 · Health
Other$371,551Education$25,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000Civil Rights$4,000Animals$4,000Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL: $9,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON COUNTY FALLEN OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCOLLINSVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetA Beacon of Light Pregnancy Help Center: $4,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGATEWAY PET GUARDIANS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINCOLN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MADISON COUNTY FALLEN OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds COLLINSVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A Beacon of Light Pregnancy Help Center ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY PET GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Dignity Period ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Employees Community Fund of the Boeing CompanyIL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard & Melissa Mark Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard & Melissa Mark Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richard & Melissa Mark Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Richard & Melissa Mark Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard & Melissa Mark Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph