Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard & Marianne Reinisch Foundation Foundation - C/O Marianne Reinisch

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$196k
Granted FY2020
26
Grants FY2020
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

International$214kPhilanthropy$200kHealth$191kEducation$63kHuman Services$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kReligion$22kArts & Culture$18kOther$0
02FY2020 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k21 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$171k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORGANIC HEALTH RESPONSE$50,000
CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$40,000
VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
COLORADO OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE$25,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF IL FOUNDATI$5,000
GILDA'S CLUB S FLORIDA$5,000
NORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL$4,115
GLENWOOD SPRINGS CHAMBER FOUNDATION$3,500
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$3,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$3,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$2,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
URBAN GATEWAYS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JCC CHICAGO: $1k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID: $1k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CO
MO
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$841k · 34 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2020, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
5

Total granted

$841k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+82%

Still filing today

44%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VV
    VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +27%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $80k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • CO
    CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -24%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +98%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
5
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
6
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
7
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
10
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
11
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home & Aid Society of Ill; the most unlike its peers is Organic Health Response Incorporated Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCOLORADO OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE: $70,000 · OtherCOLORADO OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCEIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGILDA'S CLUB S FLORIDA: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IL FOUNDATI: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS-BROWARD: $17,500 · OtherNORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL: $16,115 · Other+19 more: $88,200 · Other+19 moreORGANIC HEALTH RESPONSE INCORPORATED USA: $200,000 · InternationalORGANIC HEALTH RESPONSE INC…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · International+1 more: $4,000 · InternationalVALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthVALLEY VIEW HO…NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $8,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWIS…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $80,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNI…Highland Park Community Foundation: $3,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS: $15,000 · Arts & CultureURBAN GATEWAYS: $3,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $6,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$411,815International$214,000Health$113,000Philanthropy$83,000Education$31,000Arts & Culture$18,000Food & Nutrition$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORGANIC HEALTH RESPONSE INCORPORATED USA: $200,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetVALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLENWOOD SPRINGS CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN GATEWAYS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY SETTLEMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORGANIC HEALTH RESPONSE INCORPORATED USA ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD SPRINGS CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE CITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMBS FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GATEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Community Centers of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY SETTLEMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard & Marianne Reinisch Foundation Foundation - C/O Marianne Reinisch funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard & Marianne Reinisch Foundation Foundation - C/O Marianne Reinisch. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard & Marianne Reinisch Foundation Foundation - C/O Marianne Reinisch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph