Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$220kReligion$20kArts & Culture$17kHealth$16kEducation$11kHuman Services$5kEnvironment$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANKLIN TEMPLETON RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$57,293
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$20,000
TEMPLE SINAI$7,792
SWARTHMORE COLLEGE$3,364
DUKE MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$430
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES (JFCS)$380
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE - C O CHAB$330
WQED$260
WESA - PITTSBURGH'S NPR NEWS STATION$250
ST MARGARET FOUNDATION$250
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$208
Individual grant recipient$200
PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY$200
SHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYSTOWN: $70 → 12%HELLO NEIGHBOR: $204 → 11%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $250 → 22%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES: $100 → 18%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $50 → 11%BOYSTOWN: $36 → 12%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $45 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $110 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $87 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $75 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $72 → 11%CITY OF ASYLUM: $50 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $75 → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $50 → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $50 → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $50 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $40 → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $25 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $150 → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $103 → 11%JFCS PITTSBURGH: $100 → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $50 → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $50 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 72 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

72 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
79

Total granted

$90k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+19%

Still filing today

49%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SWARTHMORE COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +52%
  • CI
    CARNEGIE INSTITUTE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +28%
  • PS
    PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • TP
    THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION (ELLEN WEISS KANDER AWARD)
    one grant, 2017 · $300
  • PS
    PRIME STAGE
    one grant, 2023 · $300 · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
8
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
9
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
10
Parenteral Drug Association Inc

To develop scientifically sound, practical technical information and resources to advance science and regulation for the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industry through the expertise of our global membership.

—
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 169 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/81
Grantees still filing
52/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $162,150 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH+1 more: $175 · PhilanthropyFRANKLIN TEMPLETON RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $57,293 · OtherFRANKLIN TEMPLETON RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FO…TEMPLE SINAI: $18,018 · OtherTEMPLE SINAIIndividual grant recipient: $17,439 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPA ALLERGY AND ASTHMA FUND: $5,400 · Other+110 more: $27,597 · Other+110 moreCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $6,750 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $2,550 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION: $1,550 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA: $1,317 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $1,030 · Arts & CultureSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $7,964 · EducationHILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH: $952 · Education+7 more: $885 · EducationST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $2,150 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $600 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $430 · HealthSHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $400 · HealthFAMILY HOUSE INC: $300 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH: $200 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $175 · Health+9 more: $615 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $434 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $250 · Human ServicesJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $250 · Human ServicesBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $250 · Human ServicesHELLO NEIGHBOR: $204 · Human ServicesJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $203 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $106 · Human ServicesNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $100 · Human Services+3 more: $145 · Human ServicesEarth Island Institute Inc: $250 · EnvironmentVENTURE OUTDOORS INC: $150 · EnvironmentPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $99 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $76 · EnvironmentAUDUBON SOCIETY OF WESTERN PA: $50 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $25 · Environment
Philanthropy$162,325Other$125,747Arts & Culture$13,197Education$9,801Health$4,870Human Services$1,942Environment$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $162,150 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $7,964 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $6,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $2,550 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $2,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION: $1,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $1,317 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Hospice and Palliative Care: $1,280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH: $952 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $625 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $620 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $434 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $430 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRIME STAGE: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH: $300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHELLO NEIGHBOR: $204 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $203 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH: $175 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $175 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $168 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $155 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBricolage: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVENTURE OUTDOORS INC: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRICK ART & HISTORICAL CENTER INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $106 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PHYSICIANS FELLOWSHIP INC FOR MEDICINE IN ISRAEL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH CURE SARCOMA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSANO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARGARET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA ↗
  • Who funds Family Hospice and Palliative Care ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family FoundationsPA49.4× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Fine Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · The Benter Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 169 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2025, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic’s filings →

More from the funding graph