Skip to content
Revival Sport Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Revival Sport Inc

Serve communities.

$47k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Religion$1.5MRecreation & Sports$279kInternational$150kHuman Services$80kYouth Development$32kPhilanthropy$8k
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $42,915, the rows itemized in this filing. The $46,825 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,910 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$32,915
Median grant
1
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPORTS CATALYST INC$32,915
DISCIPLE DAILY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $48k → 11%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $95k → 11%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $25k → 11%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $20k → 11%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $25k → 11%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $11k → 11%INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IN
OH
CA
MO
NM
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 8 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$2.0M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
ReligionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MISSION EURASIA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $264k · revenue +180%
  • LT
    LEAD TO SERVE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $197k · revenue +22%
  • WS
    WORLD SPORTS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $159k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AN
    ALL NATIONS SPORTS
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • PI
    PHILIPPI INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue -26%
  • CM
    CIC Mission Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
2
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
3
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
6
Leadership Revolution Inc

Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.

Religion
7
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
8
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
9
Discipleship Global Inc

Our vision is to catalyze a Disciple Making Movement that will bless every church and every People, teaching others who will impact others for time and eternity.

—
10
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
11
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
12
Partners in Development Worldwide

Train ministers, lay people and students who are involved at any level of ministry in small or large churches at local, national, and international levels. We train to go into the world and spread the gospel by helping people meet their…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Eurasia; the most unlike its peers is Revival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Our Legacy: $971,263 · ReligionOur LegacyMISSION EURASIA: $264,144 · ReligionMISSION EURASIALEAD TO SERVE INC: $196,500 · ReligionLEAD TO SERVE INC+4 more: $84,540 · Religion+4 moreINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $230,231 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONA…WORLD SPORTS INC: $158,714 · Recreation & SportsWORLD SPOR…Sports Catalyst Inc: $32,915 · Recreation & SportsSports Cat…+1 more: $5,225 · Recreation & SportsRevival: $94,500 · Youth DevelopmentLOGOSDOR INC: $6,985 · Youth DevelopmentALL NATIONS SPORTS: $40,000 · OtherFAITH COMES BY HEARING INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Religion$1,516,447Human Services$230,231Recreation & Sports$196,854Youth Development$101,485Other$40,000Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOur Legacy: $971,263 over 4y, 46% of budgetMISSION EURASIA: $264,144 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING: $230,231 over 4y, 43% of budgetLEAD TO SERVE INC: $196,500 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetWORLD SPORTS INC: $158,714 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetRevival: $94,500 over 2y, 46% of budgetALL NATIONS SPORTS: $40,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetWilling To Go Inc: $39,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetSports Catalyst Inc: $32,915 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDISCIPLE DAILY INC: $24,369 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetCIC Mission Inc: $10,412 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetLOGOSDOR INC: $6,985 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetALL4ONE INC: $5,225 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…International Generos…The Maclellan Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Christian Community Foundation IncCO16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Revival Sport Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Revival Sport Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Revival Sport Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Revival Sport Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Revival Sport’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home