Skip to content

· Private foundation

Revada Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
86
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$27MEducation$7.5MFood & Nutrition$3.5MCommunity Improvement$3.5MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$897kReligion$659kHousing & Shelter$430kOther$0
02FY2025 · 86 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $696k
  • $50k–250k36 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$35,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHLIGHT THEATRE$250,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$250,000
THE IN SERIES INC$200,000
MOSIAC THEATER COMPANY OF DC$125,000
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS$115,000
KNOX COLLEGE$100,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$100,000
THE PRAXIS PROJECT$100,000
SIGNATURE THEATRE$100,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS$100,000
THE ART LEAGUE$100,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$100,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$100,000
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS$85,000
SIXTH AND I SYNAGOGUE$85,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $517k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMES NOT BORDERS: $32k → 11%ALIVE INC: $50k → 9%ALIVE INC: $50k → 9%ALIVE INC: $50k → 9%INTERFERENCE ARCHIVE: $20k → 20%ALIVE INC: $50k → 9%INTERFERENCE ARCHIVE: $10k → 20%ALIVE INC: $10k → 9%UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $50k → 6%UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $50k → 6%UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $50k → 6%UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $25k → 6%THE POZEZ JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $10k → 6%SERVICE NEVER SLEEPS: $20k → 9%SERVICE NEVER SLEEPS: $5k → 9%PATHWAYS TO HOUSING DC: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of Revada Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 15% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 13%.

Revada Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42M · 106 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

106 repeat relationships: 67 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
37

Total granted

$42M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-5%

Still filing today

75%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $224k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SIGNATURE THEATRE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +70%
  • BB
    BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3.0M · revenue +9%
  • University of Chicago
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • BF
    BURGUNDY FARM
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • PW
    PLANET WORD
    one grant, 2020 · $699k
  • CF
    Capital Fringe Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $503k · revenue -90% · 52% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
2
Center Stage Associates Inc

See schedule o.inspired by our home city, baltimore center stage acts as a cultural catalyst for all communities to access theater in every form and engage in compelling conversations. programming: capture the collective imagination and…

Arts & Culture
3
District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture
4
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
5
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
6
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
7
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
8
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
9
Stages

Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.

Arts & Culture
10
En Garde Arts Inc

To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…

Arts & Culture
11
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is Rural Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
107/109
Grantees still filing
64/109
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $6,076,625 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTSUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO-LOGAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1,661,472 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO-LOGAN CENTER FOR THE A…MOSIAC THEATER COMPANY OF DC: $1,405,000 · OtherMOSIAC THEATER COMPANY OF DCBURGUNDY FARM: $1,005,000 · OtherBURGUNDY FARMNORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $774,000 · OtherPLANET WORD: $698,763 · Other+78 more: $6,582,857 · Other+78 moreSIGNATURE THEATRE INC: $3,800,021 · Arts & CultureSIGNATURE THEATRE INCTHE STUDIO ACTING CONSERVATORY INC: $2,841,682 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIO ACTING CONSERVATORY INCTHE CODEX FOUNDATION: $1,697,700 · Arts & CultureTHE CODEX FOUNDATIONTHE BUSHWICK STARR INC: $940,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BUSHWICK STARR INCWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $586,554 · Arts & CultureMOSAIC THEATER COMPANY OF DC: $579,409 · Arts & CultureCapital Fringe Inc: $502,561 · Arts & CultureNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC: $500,000 · Arts & Culture+36 more: $3,297,001 · Arts & Culture+36 moreUniversity of Chicago: $2,760,300 · EducationUniversity of Ch…KNOX COLLEGE: $2,463,360 · EducationKNOX COLLEGEGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $400,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVE…Live It Learn It: $351,098 · EducationThe Ohio University Foundation: $315,750 · Education+10 more: $354,758 · Education+10 moreBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $3,000,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $1,700,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $325,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $125,000 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $75,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $15,000 · Food & NutritionTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $665,440 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $138,637 · HealthHEALTHY BABIES PROJECT INC: $100,000 · HealthINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Health+2 more: $45,000 · HealthSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC: $518,020 · Religion
Other$18,203,717Arts & Culture$14,744,928Education$6,645,266Community Improvement$3,100,000Food & Nutrition$2,240,000Health$999,077Religion$518,020

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $6,076,625 over 5y, 16% of budgetSIGNATURE THEATRE INC: $3,800,021 over 7y, 15% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $3,000,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE STUDIO ACTING CONSERVATORY INC: $2,841,682 over 5y, 74% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $2,760,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKNOX COLLEGE: $2,463,360 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $1,700,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CODEX FOUNDATION: $1,697,700 over 3y, 84% of budgetTHE BUSHWICK STARR INC: $940,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetNORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $774,000 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $665,440 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $586,554 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMOSAIC THEATER COMPANY OF DC: $579,409 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetSIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC: $518,020 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetCapital Fringe Inc: $502,561 over 1y, 52% of budgetNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC: $500,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $477,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $400,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $391,628 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetIN SERIES INC: $380,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetLive It Learn It: $351,098 over 6y, 13% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $325,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation: $315,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHEATREWASHINGTON: $310,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $250,499 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCritical Exposure Inc: $250,000 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $245,074 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALIVE Inc: $210,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budget1ST STAGE INC: $205,569 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetSearch Inc: $202,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $200,217 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $185,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $175,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $165,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Lodgings Inc: $160,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DOCUMENTARY STUDIES: $151,551 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $138,637 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC: $126,249 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC: $115,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetYOUTH RADIO: $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF LANGUAGE ARTS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTHY BABIES PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCAPITOL HILL ARTS WORKSHOP: $100,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetNEW PARTNERS COMMUNITY SOLAR CORP: $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDIO ACTING CONSERVATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds KNOX COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CODEX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BUSHWICK STARR INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC THEATER COMPANY OF DC ↗
  • Who funds SIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Capital Fringe Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds IN SERIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Live It Learn It ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THEATREWASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds Critical Exposure Inc ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE Inc ↗
  • Who funds 1ST STAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Search Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz FoundationDC47.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Humanities Council of Washington DC · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Latino Economic Development Corporation · Weissberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Revada Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Revada Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The American Visionary Art Museum Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 157 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Revada’s filings →

More from the funding graph