Skip to content
Reva and David Logan Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Reva and David Logan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
215
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$17MHousing & Shelter$5.2MEducation$5.1MPublic Benefit$4.5MHuman Services$4.0MHealth$3.3MCommunity Improvement$2.7MFood & Nutrition$2.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 215 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $120k
  • $10k–50k89 grants · $2.1M
  • $50k–250k101 grants · $9.8M
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$42,834
Median grant
21
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING$300,000
BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL$250,000
LAWRENCE HALL$225,000
Individual grant recipient$225,000
EMPOWERMENT AVENUE$225,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAN (CAF AMERICA)$190,000
GOOD JOBS FIRST$175,000
JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION$170,000
INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ACCURACY$163,500
ETA CREATIVE ARTS FOUNDATION$154,618
DEEPLY ROOTED DANCE THEATER$150,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
VISION MAKER MEDIA$150,000
MIDWEST CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING$150,000
ONE MILLION DEGREES$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $170k → 14%FREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $170k → 14%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $170k → 14%FREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $170k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $104k → 14%CENTRAL ADVISORY COUNCIL INC: $40k → 14%THE BLOC: $125k → 14%THE BLOC: $100k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $195k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $123k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $75k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $66k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS: $100k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS: $100k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS: $100k → 14%FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $75k → 14%FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $75k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $50k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $45k → 14%FOSTER PROGRESS: $45k → 14%FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $50k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $55k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $39k → 14%THE BLOC: $130k → 14%THE CENTRAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: $145k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $150k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $125k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $100k → 14%THE BLOC: $247k → 14%THE BLOC: $191k → 14%THE BLOC: $138k → 14%THE BLOC: $125k → 14%THE BLOC: $106k → 14%THE BLOC: $44k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $100k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $80k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $70k → 14%OPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $100k → 14%OPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $75k → 14%THE HONEYCOMB PROJECT: $90k → 14%OPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $75k → 14%THE HONEYCOMB PROJECT: $90k → 14%THE HONEYCOMB PROJECT: $90k → 14%OPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $75k → 14%THE HONEYCOMB PROJECT: $90k → 14%OPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
RI
CA
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
OK
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53M · 223 repeat orgs$6.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

223 repeat relationships: 159 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

223
132

Total granted

$53M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+20%

Still filing today

63%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +27%
  • BP
    BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +82%
  • LH
    Lawrence Hall
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • IR
    INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING PROGRAM AT UC BERKELEYIRP (REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIT
    one grant, 2023 · $320k
  • JH
    JOEL HALL DANCE COMPANY
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • IC
    INNER CITY MISSIONS NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $213k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Media Project

To impact society through the powerful tools of media and film. we are a resource for uniting individuals interested in media and developing a core group of informed citizens.

Public Benefit
2
Borderless Magazine Nfp

Borderless magazine nfp is a chicago-based nonprofit news outlet that is reimagining local immigration journalism for a more just and equitable future. we provide free, local and state news coverage to english and spanish speakers.

Arts & Culture
3
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
4
Chicago International Film Festival Inc Cinema-Chicago

Cinema/Chicago, the non-profit 501(c)(3) presenting organization of the Chicago International Film Festival, enriches the community through year-round programming devoted to international and independent cinema. We strengthen communication…

Arts & Culture
5
Reader Institute for Community Journalism Inc

Reader institute for community journalism, inc. (ricji) is organized and operated to educate, advance, and inform public discourse through local, independent journalism in the greater chicago metropolitan area. ricji operates and publishes…

Arts & Culture
6
Chicago Independent Radio Project

Operation of studio space and facilities for community radio station. The station is intended to benefit thousands of listeners and various music and arts appreciation groups throughout the chicago area.

Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Torture Justice Center

Seeks to address the traumas of police violence and institutionalized racism through access to healing and wellness services, trauma-informed resources, and community connection. The Center is a part of and supports a movement to end all…

Crime & Legal
8
Block Club Chicago Nfp

Block club chicago is a nonprofit news organization dedicated to delivering reliable, nonpartisan and essential coverage of chicago's diverse neighborhoods.

Education
9
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
10
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
11
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
12
Chicago Public Art Group

Chicago public art group brings artists and communities together to produce high-quality public art, extending and transforming the tradition of collaborative, community-involved public artwork.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abundance Setting Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

209 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 209 of the 392 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

22
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
66
Early backer (in before they grew)
205/209
Grantees still filing
134/209
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $1,400,312 · OtherLawrence Hall: $1,235,011 · Other+114 more: $24,029,679 · Other+114 moreThe People's Music School: $775,010 · Arts & CultureThe People's Music Sch…MIDWEST CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING INC: $650,000 · Arts & CultureMIDWEST CENTER FOR INV…WCIJ INC: $615,000 · Arts & CultureWCIJ INCSkyArt NFP: $574,945 · Arts & CultureChicago Art Department: $516,450 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM NETWORK INC: $500,000 · Arts & CultureINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ACCURACY: $490,380 · Arts & CultureMASSACHUSETTS MEDIA FUND INC: $460,000 · Arts & CultureKUUMBA LYNX: $438,614 · Arts & CultureInvestigateWest: $410,000 · Arts & Culture+34 more: $5,505,635 · Arts & Culture+34 moreLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $752,041 · EducationLOYOLA UNIV…GOOD JOBS FIRST: $700,000 · EducationGOOD JOBS F…Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for: $601,733 · EducationChicago Hei…ONE MILLION DEGREES: $450,000 · EducationONE MILLION…Youth Guidance: $450,000 · EducationYouth Guida…INVESTIGATIVE NEWSOURCE: $407,500 · EducationINVESTIGATI…SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC PRESS: $328,000 · EducationSAN FRANCIS…ChiArts Foundation: $300,000 · EducationChiArts Fou…NEW YORK FOCUS INC: $292,230 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $291,893 · EducationSahan Journal: $235,000 · EducationRing of Hope NFP: $226,735 · EducationTHE LENS: $225,000 · Education+2 more: $243,500 · EducationTHE BLOC: $1,230,037 · Human ServicesTHE BLOCJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $733,394 · Human ServicesJUVENILE PR…CARE FOR REAL: $614,647 · Human ServicesCARE FOR RE…CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $539,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO …OPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $461,696 · Human ServicesOPTIONS FOR…THE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP: $370,000 · Human ServicesTHE HONEYCO…FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $326,965 · Human ServicesFACING FORW…COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC: $304,892 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HO…MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $280,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION: $225,000 · Human ServicesCentral Advisory Council Inc: $206,737 · Human Services+2 more: $202,740 · Human ServicesSARAH'S CIRCLE: $637,429 · Housing & ShelterLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $589,378 · Housing & ShelterTHE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC: $399,792 · Housing & ShelterNORTH SIDE HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES: $323,540 · Housing & ShelterCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $283,115 · Housing & ShelterLA CASA NORTE: $198,840 · Housing & ShelterONE ROOF CHICAGO: $120,000 · Housing & ShelterNEO Philanthropy Inc: $2,036,278 · Public Benefit100REPORTERS: $390,000 · Public BenefitBRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $1,417,237 · Community ImprovementKenwood Oakland Community Organization: $200,000 · Community ImprovementResilience Partners NFP: $176,000 · Community Improvement
Other$26,665,002Arts & Culture$10,936,034Education$5,503,632Human Services$5,495,108Housing & Shelter$2,552,094Public Benefit$2,426,278Community Improvement$1,793,237

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $2,036,278 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $1,417,237 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $1,400,312 over 4y, 56% of budgetLawrence Hall: $1,235,011 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BLOC: $1,230,037 over 5y, 60% of budgetThe People's Music School: $775,010 over 5y, 11% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $752,041 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $733,394 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetGOOD JOBS FIRST: $700,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetMIDWEST CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING INC: $650,000 over 5y, 45% of budgetInvisible Institute: $642,647 over 4y, 19% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $637,429 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetMEDIA DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT FUND INC: $625,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWCIJ INC: $615,000 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetCARE FOR REAL: $614,647 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetChicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for: $601,733 over 5y, 10% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $589,378 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetSkyArt NFP: $574,945 over 5y, 12% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $539,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCONTEXTOS NFP: $525,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetChicago Art Department: $516,450 over 5y, 41% of budgetGLOBAL INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM NETWORK INC: $500,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ACCURACY: $490,380 over 4y, 17% of budgetPROJECT RETURN INC: $465,275 over 5y, 22% of budgetOPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $461,696 over 5y, 11% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS MEDIA FUND INC: $460,000 over 5y, 61% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES: $450,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetYouth Guidance: $450,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKUUMBA LYNX: $438,614 over 4y, 14% of budgetFUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM INC: $435,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetInvestigateWest: $410,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetINVESTIGATIVE NEWSOURCE: $407,500 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW: $400,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTHE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC: $399,792 over 4y, 3.3% of budget100REPORTERS: $390,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetINSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC: $375,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetTHE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP: $370,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetFORWARD MOMENTUM CHICAGO: $350,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetVISION MAKER MEDIA: $350,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetCODA MEDIA INC: $340,000 over 4y, 18% of budget3ARTS INC: $340,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetFree Street Theater: $337,942 over 5y, 35% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC PRESS: $328,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetFACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $326,965 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNORTH SIDE HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES: $323,540 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC: $304,892 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetChiArts Foundation: $300,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetStorycatchers: $300,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lawrence Hall ↗
  • Who funds THE BLOC ↗
  • Who funds The People's Music School ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOD JOBS FIRST ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING INC ↗
  • Who funds Invisible Institute ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WCIJ INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE FOR REAL ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SkyArt NFP ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONTEXTOS NFP ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Art Department ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ACCURACY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT RETURN INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS MEDIA FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE MILLION DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
  • Who funds KUUMBA LYNX ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM INC ↗
  • Who funds InvestigateWest ↗
  • Who funds INVESTIGATIVE NEWSOURCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Polk Bros Foundation …John D and Catherine …Field Foundation of I…United Way of Metropo…Lloyd a Fry FoundationRobert R McCormick Fo…The Chicago Community…Gaylord and Dorothy D…Arie and Ida Crown Me…Circle of Service Fou…Chicago Foundation fo…Institute for Nonprof…
Polk Bros Foundation IncIL101.7× affinity56 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · Chicago Foundation for Women · Institute for Nonprofit News

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reva and David Logan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reva and David Logan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
70report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Reva and David Logan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Reva and David Logan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 392 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reva and David Logan’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home