· Private foundation
Resource Capital Funds Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $157k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAIB FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA | $24,742 |
| ASSOCIAO ESPORTIVA E RECREATIVA DE | $20,000 |
| ASSOCIAO NOVO CAMINHO JUVENIL | $20,000 |
| ASSOCIAO ESPORTIVA E RECREATIVA DE | $20,000 |
| ASSOCIAO FILHOS DA TERRA | $19,000 |
| EENOU-EEYOU COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $18,000 |
| YOUTH FOCUS | $9,684 |
| DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NINE MILES OF SMILES | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| EVERGREEN COUGAR HOOPS BOOSTER CLUB | $2,000 |
| FUNDACION EDUCACION 2020 | $1,000 |
| STARLIGHT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| ASOCIACION DE LAS BIENAVENTURANZAS | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 40% of grant dollars ($692k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 60% that went abroad ($1.0M) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 60% of all-years giving ($1.0M)
19 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 8% of Resource Capital Funds Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.
53 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION3× · 2019–2021 · $140k · revenue +85%
- WVWARREN VILLAGE INC3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +194%
- TMTHE MORGAN CENTER3× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- ICInternational Committee of the Red Crossone grant, 2020 · $100k
BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue +6%- IFISU FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
Mountain area land trust's mission is to save natural areas, wildlife habitat, streams and rivers, working ranches and historic lands, for the benefit of the community and as a legacy for future generations.
The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…
Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
How this is measured
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 200 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES TO LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WARREN VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds HAPPY 2 BE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds POLAR CUBS CHILDCARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY LAW ↗
- Who funds THE MORGAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds Apraxia Kids ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Western Union Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Ima Foundation · Rose Foundation · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Colorado
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Resource Capital Funds Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Resource Capital Funds Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Resource Capital Funds Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Resource Capital Funds Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Resource Capital Funds’ filings →