Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rendezvous Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$97kHealth$85kPhilanthropy$38kEnvironment$21kRecreation & Sports$10kArts & Culture$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDDLE PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION$75,000
FRASER VALLEY ELEMENTARY PAC INC$13,500
VOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO$6,000
GRAND FOUNDATION$5,000
SHINING STARS FOUNDATION$3,000
EAST GRAND FIRE DISTRICT #4$2,500
GRAND COUNTY EMS$2,500
GRAND COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$1,000
MIDDLE PARK HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LITTLE SPROUTS LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$136k · 6 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$136k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+51%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FV
    FRASER VALLEY ELEMENTARY PAC INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $90k · revenue ×14 · 54% of their budget
  • CH
    COLORADO HEADWATERS LAND TRUST
    3× · 2020–2023 · $13k · revenue +552%
  • SS
    SHINING STARS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • LS
    Little Sprouts Learning Center
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -6%
  • TK
    THE KEMPE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +51%
  • CR
    COZENS RANCH MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
2
Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wildernesses

The Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wilderness (FOMELC) is a 501(c)3 charitable organization founded in November 2005. FOMELC is a 100% volunteer non-profit organization. We offer volunteer opportunities for all ages, physical…

Environment
3
Fraser Valley Community Media Inc

Fraser Valley Community Media operates community radio stations KFFR 88.3 FM and KWTR 89.1 FM to unite Grand County, Colorado, by broadcasting local music, news, cultural programming, youth education, and civic information.

Arts & Culture
4
Friends of the Grand County Library Inc

Organization raises money and makes contributions to the Grand County Colorado Library System which consists of 5 branch libraries. This is an ongoing year around activity.

Education
5
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
6
San Juan Mountains Association

To empower visitors and locals to explore, learn about and protect the spectacular public lands of Southwest Colorado.

Environment
7
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
8
Pikes Peak Athletic Foundation
Recreation & Sports
9
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
10
Friends of the Dillon Ranger District

To engage our community and support the US Forest Service's Dillon Ranger District in stewardship through: adult and youth education and diverse volunteer programs, to preserve and enhance our public lands.

Environment
11
Glenwood Springs Chamber Foundation

To support and advance the general welfare and prosperity of the greater glenwood springs, co area so that its citizens and all areas of the community may prosper and lessen the burden of local and state governments. the organization also…

Community Improvement
12
Grand Futures Prevention Coalition

To prevent substance abuse among youth and young adults in Northwest Colorado.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Kempe Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fraser Valley Elementary Pac Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRASER VALLEY ELEMENTARY PAC INC — $90,075 · EducationFRASER VALLEY ELEMENTARY PAC INC+1 more — $1,000 · EducationMIDDLE PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $75,000 · HealthMIDDLE PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATIONColumbine Community Foundation — $38,000 · PhilanthropyColumbine Commun…SHINING STARS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSHINING STAR…NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL SPO…VOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO — $8,500 · Recreation & SportsVOLUNTEERS F…COLORADO HEADWATERS LAND TRUST — $12,500 · OtherCOLORADO H…GRAND COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH — $2,500 · OtherGRAND COUN…EAST GRAND FIRE DISTRICT #4 — $2,500 · OtherEAST GRAND…COZENS RANCH MUSEUM — $2,000 · OtherCOZENS RAN…MIDDLE PARK HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY — $1,000 · OtherTHE KEMPE FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherTHE KEMPE …NORTHWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN CASA — $1,500 · OtherNORTHWEST …MOUNTAIN FAMILY CENTER — $1,000 · Other+1 more — $500 · OtherGrand County Historical Association — $5,000 · Arts & CultureLittle Sprouts Learning Center — $5,000 · Human Services
Education$91,075Health$75,000Philanthropy$38,000Recreation & Sports$28,500Other$26,000Arts & Culture$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRASER VALLEY ELEMENTARY PAC INC — $90,075 over 4y, 54% of budgetMIDDLE PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetColumbine Community Foundation — $38,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCOLORADO HEADWATERS LAND TRUST — $12,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSHINING STARS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO — $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGrand County Historical Association — $5,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLittle Sprouts Learning Center — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE KEMPE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN CASA — $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO24.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Grand Park Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Pilling Family Foundation Inc · The Summit Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rendezvous Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rendezvous Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rendezvous Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph