· Private foundation
Rencourt Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k111 grants · $254k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $177k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ZARA AINA INC | $26,019 |
| ALLIANCE TO CURE CAVERNOUS MALFORMATION | $25,000 |
| READING PARTNERS | $15,000 |
| WILD BIRD CHARITY | $15,000 |
| BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY | $13,000 |
| ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| HAGLEY MUSEUM AND LIBRARY | $10,500 |
| UNIV OF ST ANDREWS AMERICAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE | $10,000 |
| CLASSIC MOTOR MUSEUM OF ST MICHAELS | $10,000 |
| DEVON HORSE SHOW AND COUNTRY FAIR | $10,000 |
| WILMINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| LONGWOOD GARDENS | $10,000 |
| CHARLESTON WATERKEEPER | $7,962 |
| BAMA KIDS INC | $7,962 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
139 repeat relationships — 80 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WMWILMINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC8× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +12%
- CMCLASSIC MOTOR MUSEUM OF ST MICHAELS INC8× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +442%
- TTTHE TATNALL SCHOOL INC7× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- TLTHE LAND CONSERVANCY FOR SOUTHERN CHESTER COUNTYone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -12%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $20k
- PMPLAY MARINgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +102%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thread Inc and the most unlike its peers is Longwood Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
181 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 181 of the 278 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Eleutherian Mills-Hagley Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WILMINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SAHAR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds CLASSIC MOTOR MUSEUM OF ST MICHAELS INC ↗
- Who funds UCROSS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TATNALL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ZARA AINA INC ↗
- Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EDMUND BURKE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BAMA KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ANGIOMA ALLIANCE DBA ALLIANCE TO CURE CAVERNOUS MALFORMATIONS ↗
- Who funds WILCOX COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KENNETT LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds FAITHFUL FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds COLLETON COUNTY HISTORICAL AND PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BRANDYWINE VALLEY SUMMER SALES SERIES ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAND CONSERVANCY FOR SOUTHERN CHESTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
- Who funds DELMARVA NESTING FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Welfare Foundation Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Longwood Foundation Inc · Nor' Easter Foundation Inc · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Ederic Foundation Inc · Chester County Community Foundation · Sharp Foundation · Chichester Dupont Foundation Inc · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Ellice & Rosa McDonald Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rencourt Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- 4th Dimension Leaders Inc — 69% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc — 33% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Delaware Inc — 19% of income from government
- Delaware College Scholars Inc — 18% of income from government
- The Freshwater Trust — 17% of income from government
- Faithful Friends Inc — 15% of income from government
- Shorerivers Inc — 13% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- Teensharp — 11% of income from government
- First State Ballet Theatre Inc — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- First State Squash Inc — 7% of income from government
- Delaware Center for Horticulture Inc — 4% of income from government
- Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc — 2% of income from government
- Delaware Hospice Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Pilot School Incorporated — 1% of income from government
- Historic Odessa Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Eleutherian Mills-Hagley Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Tatnall School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rencourt Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Rencourt Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.