Skip to content
Remy's Good Day Fund at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Remy's Good Day Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$289kArts & Culture$135kFood & Nutrition$124kEducation$48kHousing & Shelter$22kInternational$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kHuman Services$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
$17,177
Median grant
3
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICROGRID SYSTEMS LABORATORY$25,000
SF FARMERS MARKET INSTITUTE$20,101
NEW ENERGY ECONOMY$20,000
COVENANT PATHWAYS$17,177
SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION$15,025
NORTHERN NEW MEXICO COLLEGE$14,500
CONSERVATION LEGACY$6,100
SANTA FE INDIGEOUS CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 31%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPI FOUNDATION: $312 → 26%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $50k → 32%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $17k → 32%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $2k → 18%CASA MILAGRO: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Remy's Good Day Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in NM; by stated purpose, 69%.

Remy's Good Day Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 9 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
20

Total granted

$462k
$189k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+0%

Still filing today

33%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CORNERSTONES COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $135k · revenue -13%
  • CP
    COVENANT PATHWAYS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $67k · revenue +50%
  • GS
    GALLUP SOLAR INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $58k

Funded once

  • AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +16%
  • DC
    Dixon Community Fire Department
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -4% · 28% of their budget
  • WF
    WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nia Tero Foundation

Nia tero works alongside indigenous peoples to secure their guardianship of vital ecosystems. indigenous peoples are guardians of earth.(see schedule o)

Environment
2
Sovereign Energy

Sovereign Energy builds the individual and collective power of Southwest Pueblos and Tribes to lead the way toward a just, interdependent, and sustainable energy future.

Environment
3
Quivira Coalition Inc

Through education, innovation, and collaboration, quivira works in coalition with ranchers, farmers, government agencies, and land stewards to foster resilience on working lands.

Environment
4
The Mountain Institute Inc

Advance the well- being of mountain people and conservation of mountain environments.

—
5
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
6
Land Peace Foundation

The Land Peace Foundation is an Indigenous led educational organization that is dedicated to preserving the Indigenous way of life and cultivating strong Indigenous leadership. We are also deeply committed to stewarding responsible climate…

Arts & Culture
7
Santa Fe Forest Coalition

Educate the public on forest conservation issues in New Mexico

Environment
8
Reunity Resources

To provide education and promote the use of recycling, sustainable practices alternative energy and community resources for the betterment of the environment and public at large.

Environment
9
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
10
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
11
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
12
Natura Bolivia Foundation

The Natura Bolivia Foundation is dedicated to implementing, and evaluating the impact of conservation and development programs, with a focus on watershed conservation, protected areas, and incentive based conservation in Bolivia. We work…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sustainable Markets Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dixon Community Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GALLUP SOLAR INC: $58,458 · OtherGALLUP SOLAR INCIndividual grant recipient: $41,866 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMICROGRID SYSTEMS LABORATORY: $35,000 · OtherMICROGRID SYSTEMS LABORATORYNORTHERN NEW MEXICO COLLEGE: $34,500 · OtherNORTHERN NEW MEXICO COLLEGECOVENANT PATHWAYS SPIRIT FARM: $27,802 · OtherCOVENANT PATHWAYS SPIRIT FARMSF FARMERS MARKET INSTITUTE: $20,101 · OtherSF FARMERS MARKET INSTITUTESANTA FE INDIGENOUS CENTER: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherPUEBLO ADOBE SOLAR INITIATIVE: $12,500 · OtherJEMEZ PUEBLO TRIBAL NETWORK: $10,877 · Other+7 more: $50,099 · Other+7 moreCORNERSTONES COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS: $135,000 · Arts & CultureCORNERSTONES COMMUNITY …TALKING TALONS YOUTH LEADERSHIP: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTALKING TALONS YOUTH LE…NEW ENERGY ECONOMY INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentNEW ENERGY E…SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $15,025 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE …The Pachamama Alliance: $10,000 · EnvironmentThe Pachamam…TAOS LAND TRUST: $4,757 · EnvironmentTAOS LAND TR…COVENANT PATHWAYS: $66,888 · Human ServicesCOVENANT PA…+3 more: $4,312 · Human Services+3 moreAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $20,000 · EducationSTEM Santa Fe: $10,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology: $7,500 · EducationDixon Community Fire Department: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · International
Other$323,203Arts & Culture$145,000Environment$74,782Human Services$71,200Education$37,500Public Safety & Disaster$20,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORNERSTONES COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS: $135,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCOVENANT PATHWAYS: $66,888 over 2y, 18% of budgetNEW ENERGY ECONOMY INC: $45,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDixon Community Fire Department: $20,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $15,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OFFGRID INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTALKING TALONS YOUTH LEADERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSTEM Santa Fe: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY: $6,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAOS LAND TRUST: $4,757 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA MILAGRO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI: $312 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Marshall L and Perrin…New Mexico Community …First Nations Develop…Albuquerque Community…Arizona Community Fou…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Remy's Good Day Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Remy's Good Day Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Remy's Good Day Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Remy's Good Day Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Remy's Good Day’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home