Skip to content

· Private foundation

Remnant Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$446kPublic Safety & Disaster$108kInternational$90kHealth$30kCivil Rights$28kPhilanthropy$14kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
$6,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$17
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Beginning Ministries$18,000
Kingdom Come Church$18,000
Individual grant recipient$14,400
New Orleans Community Church$12,000
EastWest Ministries$9,425
Day Star Bapitst Missions$6,508
Kufkia International$6,064
Inner Chamber Church$6,000
Firebrand Ministries$6,000
ALFWA Hames Mission$6,000
Mathew 25 International$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Woodstock Community Church$6,000
P Hope Assembly of God$6,000
Louisiana Right to Life$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Louisiana Right to Life: $5k → 23%Louisiana Right to Life: $5k → 23%Louisiana Right to Life: $5k → 23%Louisiana Right to Life: $5k → 23%LOUISIANA RIGHT TO LIFE: $3k → 23%Louisiana Right to Life: $3k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
IN
OH
CA
MO
WV
VA
TN
NC
LA
MS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Remnant Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Remnant Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$628k · 31 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
26

Total granted

$628k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+33%

Still filing today

10%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LR
    Louisiana Right to Life Educational Committee Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +3%
  • GS
    GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +22%
  • KI
    KUFIKIA INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • NB
    New Beginning International Ministr
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
  • NB
    NEW BEGINNING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • NB
    New Beginning InternationMinistries
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Light of Life International Inc

Light of life international exists to win souls and reach the poor through international crusades and compassion. light of life international is also committed to igniting fire and destiny in the hearts of men and women through evangelism…

Religion
2
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
3
Proclaiming the Gospel

Our mission is to serve, honor and glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by proclaiming His Gospel of grace throughout the world. In addition, we endeavor to equip and encourage Christians to be faithful and effective ambassadors in carrying out…

Religion
4
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
5
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
6
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
7
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
8
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
9
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
10
Everything Laid Down Ministries

To give the gospel of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to the poor and dejected of the world. We do this by caring for widows, orphans, and broken people around the world. We care for hem by feeding, clothing, and encouraging them in Jesus by His…

Religion
11
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
12
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Center for Philanthropy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $79,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $73,800 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHURCHNew Beginning Ministries: $54,500 · OtherNew Beginning MinistriesNew Orleans Community Church: $46,500 · OtherNew Orleans Community ChurchKINGDOM COME CHURCH: $37,000 · OtherKINGDOM COME CHURCHP HOPE ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $36,000 · OtherP HOPE ASSEMBLY OF GODIndividual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $26,500 · OtherMathew 25 International: $23,000 · Other+42 more: $224,055 · Other+42 moreEast-West Ministries International: $23,225 · ReligionKUFIKIA INTERNATIONAL: $12,128 · ReligionLouisiana Right to Life Educational Committee Inc: $25,500 · Human ServicesGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $17,088 · InternationalGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $14,800 · EducationTHE AMERICAN CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY INC: $13,100 · PhilanthropyEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PURPLE LEMON INC: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$634,555Religion$35,353Human Services$25,500International$17,088Education$14,800Philanthropy$13,100Housing & Shelter$2,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLouisiana Right to Life Educational Committee Inc: $25,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $17,088 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $14,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY INC: $13,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKUFIKIA INTERNATIONAL: $12,128 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PURPLE LEMON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Louisiana Right to Life Educational Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds KUFIKIA INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Remnant Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Remnant Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Remnant’s filings →

    More from the funding graph