Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Remnant Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$446kPublic Safety & Disaster$108kInternational$90kHealth$30kCivil Rights$28kPhilanthropy$14kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
$6,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$17
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Beginning Ministries$18,000
Kingdom Come Church$18,000
Individual grant recipient$14,400
New Orleans Community Church$12,000
EastWest Ministries$9,425
Day Star Bapitst Missions$6,508
Kufkia International$6,064
Individual grant recipient$6,000
ALFWA Hames Mission$6,000
Mathew 25 International$6,000
Firebrand Ministries$6,000
Woodstock Community Church$6,000
P Hope Assembly of God$6,000
Inner Chamber Church$6,000
Louisiana Right to Life$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Louisiana Right to Life: $5k → 23%Louisiana Right to Life: $5k → 23%Louisiana Right to Life: $5k → 23%Louisiana Right to Life: $5k → 23%LOUISIANA RIGHT TO LIFE: $3k → 23%Louisiana Right to Life: $3k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
IN
OH
CA
MO
WV
VA
TN
NC
LA
MS
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Remnant Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Remnant Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$628k · 31 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
26

Total granted

$628k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+33%

Still filing today

10%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LR
    Louisiana Right to Life Educational Committee Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +3%
  • GS
    GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +22%
  • KI
    KUFIKIA INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • NB
    New Beginning International Ministr
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
  • NB
    NEW BEGINNING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • NB
    New Beginning InternationMinistries
    one grant, 2022 · $18k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Light of Life International Inc

Light of life international exists to win souls and reach the poor through international crusades and compassion. light of life international is also committed to igniting fire and destiny in the hearts of men and women through evangelism…

Religion
2
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
3
Proclaiming the Gospel

Our mission is to serve, honor and glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by proclaiming His Gospel of grace throughout the world. In addition, we endeavor to equip and encourage Christians to be faithful and effective ambassadors in carrying out…

Religion
4
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
5
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
6
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
7
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
8
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
9
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
10
Everything Laid Down Ministries

To give the gospel of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to the poor and dejected of the world. We do this by caring for widows, orphans, and broken people around the world. We care for hem by feeding, clothing, and encouraging them in Jesus by His…

Religion
11
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
12
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc and the most unlike its peers is The American Center for Philanthropy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $79,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $73,800 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHURCHNew Beginning Ministries — $54,500 · OtherNew Beginning MinistriesNew Orleans Community Church — $46,500 · OtherNew Orleans Community ChurchKINGDOM COME CHURCH — $37,000 · OtherKINGDOM COME CHURCHP HOPE ASSEMBLY OF GOD — $36,000 · OtherP HOPE ASSEMBLY OF GODIndividual grant recipient — $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $26,500 · OtherMathew 25 International — $23,000 · Other+42 more — $224,055 · Other+42 moreEast-West Ministries International — $23,225 · ReligionKUFIKIA INTERNATIONAL — $12,128 · ReligionLouisiana Right to Life Educational Committee Inc — $25,500 · Human ServicesGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC — $17,088 · InternationalGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC — $14,800 · EducationTHE AMERICAN CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY INC — $13,100 · PhilanthropyEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC — $2,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PURPLE LEMON INC — $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$634,555Religion$35,353Human Services$25,500International$17,088Education$14,800Philanthropy$13,100Housing & Shelter$2,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLouisiana Right to Life Educational Committee Inc — $25,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC — $17,088 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC — $14,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY INC — $13,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKUFIKIA INTERNATIONAL — $12,128 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PURPLE LEMON INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Louisiana Right to Life Educational Committee Inc
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY INC
  • Who funds KUFIKIA INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Remnant Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph