· Public charity
Reinvestment Partners
To foster healthy and just communities by working with people, places and policy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $283,172 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $302,257 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,085 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $266k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Community Link | $25,000 |
| Experiment in Self-Reliance | $24,510 |
| New Hanover County VITA Program | $21,409 |
| OnTrack Financial Education and Counseling | $20,011 |
| Central NC Tax Assistance | $19,650 |
| NC High Country Free Tax Coalition (CO Watauga County Public Library) | $18,995 |
| Davidson Medical Ministries DC Connect | $18,500 |
| Ada Jenkins Center | $17,750 |
| Orange County Department on Aging Volunteer Connect 55 VITA | $17,496 |
| Chatham County Council on Aging | $13,781 |
| Rufty-Holmes Senior Center | $13,500 |
| Blue Ridge Community Action | $13,500 |
| City of High Point | $11,125 |
| Reidsville Senior Center | $10,500 |
| City of Eden (Garden of Eden Senior Center) | $10,259 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCConsumer Credit Counseling Service of Western North Carolina Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $62k · revenue +24%
- CNCENTRAL NC TAX ASSISTANCE2× · 2023–2024 · $37k · revenue +25% · 80% of their budget
- BRBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY ACTION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $37k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- OOthersone grant, 2020 · $39k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLone grant, 2020 · $28k
- GFGASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue +113%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the self-reliance of women by assessing needs, providing services, and acting as a gateway to community resources; to seek solutions for unmet needs by providing strategic leadership through collaboration and partnerships within…
Raleigh county community action association, inc. empowers individuals and families to reach their highest levels of social and economical self-sufficiency, while identifying and eliminating causes of poverty. rccaa provides direct…
The Counseling Center strives to strengthen families and individuals by providing access to quality mental health services regardless of financial ability.
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…
Carolina health centers offers primary care and patient support services to improve health, well-being and quality of life throughout the communities we serve.
The north carolina community health worker association (ncchwa) is the professional home for community health workers (chws) across the state of north carolina
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
To assist members of our community experiencing crisis with basic needs, in an atmosphere of compassion and respect.
Provide services for the elderly & transportation services.
NC MedAssist is a nonprofit pharmacy program providing access to lifesaving prescription medications, client support, advocacy and other services to poor, vulnerable, and uninsured North Carolina residents.
Create a community where individuals impacted by homelessness, poverty, and unemployment are empowered through our transitional programs and transformed by the love and ministry of Jesus Christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Resources of Guilford and the most unlike its peers is Treesdurham. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Experiment In Self-Reliance Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Link Programs of Travelers Aid Society of Central Carolinas Inc ↗
- Who funds Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Western North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD ↗
- Who funds Ada Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL NC TAX ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds RUFTY-HOLMES SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Mooresville Area Christian Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds TREESDURHAM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Leon Levine Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Reinvestment Partners funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.