Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger.

$92M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Food & Nutrition$36MPublic Safety & Disaster$277kReligion$217kHuman Services$123kCommunity Improvement$89kYouth Development$87kHousing & Shelter$54kHealth$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 31 grants below total $345,654 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $92,253,459 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $91,907,805 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $157k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $189k
$8,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA$45,000
HANDS OF JESUS GUTHRIE$29,216
THE HOPE CENTER FRC$26,549
JESUS HOUSE$15,132
PROJECT 66$13,923
HELP OF ELK CITY FRC$13,700
FOOD & RESOURCE CENTER$13,107
PERRY FOOD PANTRY$11,516
BIBLE METHODIST CHURCH$10,481
HILLTOP ASSEMBLY OF GOD$10,062
ALAMEDA CHURCH OF CHRIST$9,913
OUR DAILY BREAD FRC$9,500
CROSSOVER CHURCH OUTREACH CENTER$9,087
SNOWHILL BAPTIST CHURCH$8,914
PLEASANT HILL BAPTIST CHURCH$8,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TRI CITY HOPE CENTER INC: $10k → 10%WEATHERFORD FRC: $15k → 16%NEW AGE PROJECT INC: $10k → 23%BIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 23%CONNECTIONS FRC: $10k → 16%JESUS HOUSE: $35k → 16%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 25%WEATHERFORD FRC: $8k → 16%JESUS HOUSE: $15k → 16%OPERATION CARE MINISTRIES: $5k → 17%JESUS HOUSE: $6k → 16%CHRISTIAN HELPING HANDS: $11k → 19%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $6k → 14%CHRISTIAN HELPING HANDS: $10k → 19%OKC DREAM CENTER: $22k → 16%CHRISTIAN HELPING HANDS: $9k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELPING HANDS COMANCHE SENIOR NUTRITION: $6k → 19%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $26k → 16%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $15k → 16%PROJECT 66: $14k → 16%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $10k → 16%PROJECT 66: $10k → 16%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $10k → 16%PROJECT 66: $10k → 16%SKYLINE URBAN MINISTRY: $8k → 16%BRITVIL COMMUNITY FP: $6k → 16%HOPE CENTER OF EDMOND: $7k → 16%HOPE CENTER OF EDMOND: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$36M · 41 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
74

Total granted

$36M
$929k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+6%

Still filing today

56%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WOODWARD FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $83k · revenue +169%
  • MN
    MISSION NORMAN INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $78k · revenue +98%
  • CM
    COMMUNITY MARKET OF POTT COUNT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $62k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $138k · revenue +10%
  • SO
    SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU
    one grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue +24%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tillman County Food Bank Foundation
—
2
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
3
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
4
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc

The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.

Human Services
5
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Heart of Putnam Food Pantry Inc Sharing Putnams Bounty

Providing food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
7
Medina County Food Pantry

Provide emergency food for those in need.

Human Services
8
3G Food Pantry

Local food pantry serving those food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
9
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
10
Bread of Refuge Inc

Bread of Refuge is a food pantry that distributes over 1600 banana boxes of food every month to families in need. We also feed 75-to-100 homeless people every week.

Human Services
11
Harvest of Hope Food Pantry Inc

Food Pantry

—
12
Browns Valley Food Shelf Inc
Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lawton Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Oakridge Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr13%9%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr17%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr17%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/123
the rest of the field
14%
1,800/13,151

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/58
Grantees still filing
34/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGIONAL FOOD BANK FOUNDATION — $34,124,020 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK FOUNDATION+19 more — $683,736 · Food & NutritionTHE SALVATION ARMY — $71,967 · OtherElk City Help Inc — $48,700 · OtherST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $44,556 · OtherNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC — $44,316 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD — $42,000 · Other+75 more — $930,706 · OtherSKYLINE URBAN OUTREACH INC — $67,653 · Human ServicesPROJECT 66 INC — $57,923 · Human ServicesJesus House Inc — $55,996 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HELPING HANDS OF COMANCHE — $35,283 · Human ServicesWeatherford Food & Resource Center Inc — $32,500 · Human ServicesDream Center Inc — $22,311 · Human ServicesHOPE CENTER OF EDMOND INC — $12,529 · Human Services+8 more — $61,193 · Human ServicesMISSION NORMAN INC — $77,663 · Housing & ShelterFOOD AND SHELTER INC — $27,500 · Housing & ShelterBETHEL FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterOther Options Inc — $34,741 · HealthSOUTHERN OKLA ADDICTION RECOVERY INC — $10,000 · HealthBROADWAY HOUSE INC — $10,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU — $45,000 · Community ImprovementLANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $21,419 · EducationOPPORTUNITIES INC — $6,000 · Education
Food & Nutrition$34,807,756Other$1,182,245Human Services$345,388Housing & Shelter$111,163Health$54,741Community Improvement$45,000Education$27,419

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK FOUNDATION — $34,124,020 over 3y, 98% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $137,649 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOODWARD FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES INC — $82,749 over 5y, 12% of budgetMISSION NORMAN INC — $77,663 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetSKYLINE URBAN OUTREACH INC — $67,653 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY MARKET OF POTT COUNT — $61,775 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCING INC dba OUR DAILY BREAD FOOD & RESOURCE CTR — $58,973 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT 66 INC — $57,923 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetJesus House Inc — $55,996 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHANDS OF HOPE INC — $52,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetElk City Help Inc — $48,700 over 4y, 15% of budgetFOOD AND RESOURCE CENTER OF SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC — $48,107 over 4y, 11% of budgetSOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU — $45,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $44,556 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC — $44,316 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC — $39,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAWTON FOOD BANK INC — $37,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELPING HANDS OF COMANCHE — $35,283 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetOther Options Inc — $34,741 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES OF NW OKLA INC — $33,750 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWeatherford Food & Resource Center Inc — $32,500 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetFirst Methodist Church of Ada Foundation Inc — $30,946 over 2y, 17% of budgetFOOD AND SHELTER INC — $27,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDream Center Inc — $22,311 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetLANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $21,419 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOAKRIDGE MINISTRIES INC — $18,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC — $17,617 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI — $16,485 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITANS OF PAULS VALLEY — $16,298 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetGOD'S FOOD BANK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetTHE URBAN MISSION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE CENTER OF EDMOND INC — $12,529 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChristians Concern — $10,693 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSOUTHERN OKLA ADDICTION RECOVERY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMARLOW SAMARITANS — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetStroud Food Pantry Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBROADWAY HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetOUR NEIGHBORS CUPBOARD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTRI CITY HOPE CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetNew Age Project Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRESURRECTION HOUSE ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIAL SERVICES FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMANNA PANTRY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSEMINOLE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Oklahoma City Communi…Sarkeys FoundationFeed the Children IncThe Anne and Henry Za…Community Foundation …McCrory FoundationSouthern Oklahoma Mem…Inasmuch FoundationWegener Foundation IncThe Priddy FoundationHarris Foundation Inc
Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK31.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Feed the Children Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Community Foundation of Ardmore Inc · McCrory Foundation · Southern Oklahoma Memorial Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · The Priddy Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 270%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Big Five Community Services Inc — 75% of income from government
  • Community Market of Pott Count — 57% of income from government
  • Southwest Oklahoma Community Action Grou — 38% of income from government
  • Opportunities Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Food and Shelter Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Oakridge Ministries Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
27get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 124 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines