Skip to content

· Public charity

Region 10 League for Economic Assistance and Planning Inc

Provides programs and services that meet the needs of the people in the region, are cost-effective, reduce the burden of local governments, leverage available resources, and support our charitable status.

$2.1M
Granted FY2022
30
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Food & Nutrition$2.3MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$486kArts & Culture$371kCrime & Legal$323kCommunity Improvement$259kRecreation & Sports$174kPublic Safety & Disaster$120kOther$0
02FY2022 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 30 grants below total $410,280, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,145,565 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,735,285 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k12 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $262k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENIOR COMMUNITY MEALS INC$58,104
MONTROSE COUNTY SR CITIZENS TRANSPO$24,149
DELTA THEATERS LLC$17,500
ELK AVENUE BREWING COMPANY$15,000
ACTION LEARNING ASSOCIATES LLC$15,000
SPARK CONSULTING LLC$15,000
LAKE CITY DIRT INC$15,000
DREAMING TREE GROUP INC$15,000
VILLAGE CENTER CLEANERS$15,000
BUFFINGTON ENTERPRISES LLC$15,000
JR DELTA LLC$15,000
MONTROSE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$15,000
CAI LONG INC$15,000
HIGH ALPINE BREWING COMPANY$15,000
WEST END ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $483k → 15%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $467k → 15%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $95k → 15%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $63k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 22 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 12 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
108

Total granted

$4.2M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-48%
+19%

Still filing today

23%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA CARE FACILITIES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.1M · revenue -59%
  • AP
    ALL POINT TRANSIT
    6× · 2017–2022 · $927k
  • VS
    VOANS SENIOR COMMUNITY MEALS INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $661k · revenue -48% · 75% of their budget

Funded once

  • DJ
    DOUBLE J MECHANICAL
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • SA
    STONE AGE MASONRY LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • SJ
    SAN JUAN EVENTS LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Events

Colorado events mission is to organize community events that increase public knowledge and appreciation for visual arts, fine crafts, and supporting local merchants, by creating opportunities that connect artists and local businesses, with…

—
2
Montana Center for the Arts

Montana center for the arts purpose is to nurture, promote and expand cultural engagement and opportunity in our region. through collaboration with the community at large, and in partnership with the area's diverse cultural and educational…

Arts & Culture
3
Painted Sky Center for the Arts

Our mission is to advance arts education and entertainment, enhancing the quality of life, and promoting cultural development in Grant County. Painted Sky Center for the Arts provides arts education and performances for youth and adults,…

Arts & Culture
4
Montrose Childrens Museum

Foster a learning environment by igniting imagination and fueling creativity of children and adults alike. With interactive play in a hands-on learning museum, we will inspire childrens intellect, curiosity, and a life-long love of…

Arts & Culture
5
Wind River Valley Artist Guild
—
6
Grand Mesa Impressionz Inc

Provides local artists and craftsmen with a gallary, promotes cultural events in the area, and encourages self sufficiency.

Arts & Culture
7
Ouray County Historical Society

Historical Society for Ouray County, Colorado Museum, Historical Programs, mining, ranching and indian exhibit and artifacts, archiving historical documents and historical programs for the general public.

—
8
Sedona Symphony

The Sedona Symphony is committed to enriching the quality of life of our Northern Arizona community through the power of live orchestral music that educates, entertains, and inspires. From timeless classics to bold contemporary works, the…

Arts & Culture
9
Colorado Assoc of Conservation District

The mission of cacd is to serve as the unified voice for the conservation districts of colorado.

—
10
Gunnison Creative District

The Gunnison Creative district strengthens and enlivens Gunnison by building community connections,encouraging economic activity, and highlighting our community?s identity, through the flourishing presence ofcreative industries and…

Arts & Culture
11
Wallowa Valley Arts Council

To promote the arts in wallowa county, oregon.

—
12
The Cultural Caravan

The Cultural Caravan brings together locally-owned businesses, social-serviced nonprofits, municipal organizations, and local artists to make Boulder more vibrant, inclusive, culturally active, and economically vital by presenting…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crested Butte Wildflower Festival Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Sprouts Community Preschool. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL POINT TRANSIT: $926,650 · OtherALL POINT TRANSITVOANS SENIOR COMMUNITY MEALS INC: $660,917 · OtherVOANS SENIOR COMMUNITY MEALS INCSENIOR COMMUNITY MEALS: $584,779 · OtherSENIOR COMMUNITY MEALSOURAY COUNTY (N2N): $206,747 · Other+135 more: $2,007,527 · Other+135 moreVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA CARE FACILITIES: $1,107,961 · Human ServicesVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA…UNCOMPAHGRE VOLUNTEER LEGAL AID INC: $125,334 · Crime & LegalTRI-COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK: $115,940 · HealthTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsCRESTED BUTTE WILDFLOWER FESTIVAL INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsSURFACE CREEK SADDLE CLUB INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMONTROSE CENTER FOR ARTS: $15,000 · Arts & CultureVALLEY YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGRAND MESA ARTS & EVENTS CENTER INC: $7,767 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE PARADISE THEATER: $7,500 · Arts & CultureLake City Downtown Improvement and Revitalization: $15,000 · Community ImprovementWEST END ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,386,620Human Services$1,107,961Crime & Legal$125,334Health$115,940Recreation & Sports$100,000Arts & Culture$40,267Community Improvement$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA CARE FACILITIES: $1,107,961 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetVOANS SENIOR COMMUNITY MEALS INC: $660,917 over 3y, 75% of budgetUNCOMPAHGRE VOLUNTEER LEGAL AID INC: $125,334 over 4y, 34% of budgetTRI-COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK: $115,940 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO INTERPRETIVE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetAH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCRESTED BUTTE WILDFLOWER FESTIVAL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetLake City Downtown Improvement and Revitalization: $15,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetRAINBOW SCHOOL AND DAY CARE CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWEST END ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMONTROSE CENTER FOR ARTS: $15,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetBENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE USA: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSURFACE CREEK SADDLE CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetDelta Elks Lodge No 1235: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetLITTLE SPROUTS COMMUNITY PRESCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetGRAND MESA ARTS & EVENTS CENTER INC: $7,767 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetALL AMERICAN FAMILIES: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PARADISE THEATER: $7,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSURFACE CREEK VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,549 over 1y, 8.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA CARE FACILITIES ↗
  • Who funds VOANS SENIOR COMMUNITY MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNCOMPAHGRE VOLUNTEER LEGAL AID INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN COLORADO INTERPRETIVE ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationCO18.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley · Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · Anschutz Family Foundation · Telluride Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Region 10 League for Economic Assistance and Planning Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Region 10 League for Economic Assistance and Planning Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Region 10 League for Economic Assistance and Planning’s filings →

    More from the funding graph