Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Redlich Horwitz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$25M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$27MHuman Services$10MCrime & Legal$2.2MArts & Culture$1.6MCivil Rights$1.3MPublic Benefit$1.2MEducation$1.2MYouth Development$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $25M
$70,400
Median grant
7
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSITA GROUP LTD$25,000,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY$350,000
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS$200,000
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK$175,000
HOPE585$167,000
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL$132,000
WESTCHESTER COUNTY DPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES$125,000
THE NEW SCHOOL$110,000
FOSTERING GREATNESS INC$107,100
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$100,000
FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE$100,000
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PA$94,445
CENTER FOR COURT INNOVATION$83,000
FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS$80,000
CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Children's Home of Jefferson County: $75k → 14%You Gotta Believe: $88k → 20%Alia: $189k → 14%GATEWAY LONGVIEW: $67k → 13%Alia: $100k → 14%The Children's Village: $170k → 9%ALIA: $70k → 14%The Children's Village: $137k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $67k → 9%The Children's Village: $110k → 9%ALIA: $100k → 14%FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS: $120k → 14%Fostering Change for Children: $113k → 7%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $98k → 9%Fostering Media Connections: $80k → 14%FOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN: $75k → 7%FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS: $80k → 14%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $322k → 20%FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS: $80k → 14%Heartshare St Vincent's Services: $156k → 20%Fostering Media Connections: $70k → 14%HOPE585: $167k → 14%Rising Ground: $100k → 20%THE HUB585: $59k → 14%RISING GROUND: $88k → 20%FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE: $320k → 14%Heartshare St Vincent's Services: $55k → 20%FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE: $290k → 14%FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE: $210k → 14%Parsons Child and Family Center: $155k → 14%FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE: $100k → 14%Parsons Child and Family Center: $80k → 14%Parsons Child and Family Center: $75k → 14%Families Together in New York State: $60k → 14%Good Shepherd Services: $100k → 17%Good Shepherd Services: $100k → 17%Graham Windham: $215k → 17%Graham Windham: $150k → 17%Graham Windham: $150k → 17%Graham Windham: $125k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $113k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $113k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $110k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $110k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $93k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $93k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
WI
NY
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
NC
DC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 72 repeat orgs$27M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

72 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
97

Total granted

$19M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

54%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalEducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.3M · revenue +3%
  • FT
    FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +21%
  • AF
    ADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $883k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • AF
    ANU Family Services
    one grant, 2017 · $204k
  • FJ
    FAMILY JUSTICE LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $92k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
2
Avenues for Justice Inc

Avenues for justice operates a progressive diversion program for nyc court-involved and at-risk youth, ages 13 to 24, through adapted hybrid online and onsite programming, and 24/7 mentorship with community-based court advocates, the…

Crime & Legal
3
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
4
Little Flower Children Family Services of New York

Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…

Human Services
5
Friends of the Children- New York

Friends of the children - new york has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Crime & Legal
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA), New York City is a child

Civil Rights
7
Youth Justice Network Inc

Youth Justice Network (YJN)s mission is to break cycles of incarceration and build an equitable justice system by providing young people with individualized advocacy, mentorship, and opportunities to grow, thrive, and lead. (SEE SCHEDULE O)

Human Services
8
Advocates for Children of New York

To ensure a high quality education for new york students who face barriers to academic success, focusing on students from low-income backgrounds.

Crime & Legal
9
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
10
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
11
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
12
The Family Center Inc

Provide social, legal & behavioral health services to individuals and families affected by life-altering events.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Yorkers for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Insita Group Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportFood Banks and PantriesDomestic Violence ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%13%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%67%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%5%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/91
the rest of the field
10%
11,857/120,669

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 181 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/88
Grantees still filing
56/88
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INSITA GROUP LTD — $25,000,000 · PhilanthropyINSITA GROUP LTDTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $1,082,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $1,732,200 · Philanthropy+3 moreADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK — $882,820 · OtherADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMIL…Schuyler Center — $592,580 · OtherSchuyler CenterCENTER FOR COURT INNOVATION — $583,000 · OtherCENTER FOR COURT INNOVA…LEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $525,000 · OtherOnondago Cty Dept of Children Fam S — $410,767 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $375,000 · OtherBUILDING BRIDGES INITIATIVE — $343,000 · Other+115 more — $6,569,571 · Other+115 moreFAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE INC — $1,080,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES TOGETHE…GRAHAM WINDHAM — $840,000 · Human ServicesGRAHAM WINDHAMTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY — $798,459 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S A…THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC — $602,300 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S V…ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC — $583,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT'S SER…FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS — $530,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING MEDIA …ALIA — $509,012 · Human ServicesALIAFOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN LTD — $400,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING CHANGE…PARSONS CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER — $325,000 · Human ServicesRISING GROUND INC — $320,000 · Human ServicesHope585 Inc — $265,500 · Human Services+22 more — $967,334 · Human Services+22 moreNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,319,550 · Crime & LegalErie County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Project Inc — $300,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY JUSTICE LAW CENTER INC — $100,000 · Crime & LegalTHE BRONX DEFENDERS — $63,250 · Crime & Legal+5 more — $70,750 · Crime & LegalTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $468,000 · EducationThe New School — $260,000 · EducationSAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC — $75,000 · Education+4 more — $45,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC — $496,775 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $106,000 · Civil RightsBROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES — $62,840 · Civil RightsFOSTERING GREATNESS INC — $268,000 · Housing & ShelterFAIR SHARE HOUSING CENTER INC — $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$27,814,200Other$10,281,738Human Services$7,220,605Crime & Legal$1,853,550Education$848,000Civil Rights$665,615Housing & Shelter$278,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINSITA GROUP LTD — $25,000,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,319,550 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $1,082,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE INC — $1,080,000 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK — $882,820 over 8y, 22% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $872,200 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $855,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM — $840,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY — $798,459 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC — $602,300 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC — $583,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS — $530,000 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $525,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetALIA — $509,012 over 5y, 21% of budgetCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC — $496,775 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $468,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN LTD — $400,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES INITIATIVE — $343,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetPARSONS CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER — $325,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRISING GROUND INC — $320,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetErie County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Project Inc — $300,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetFOSTERING GREATNESS INC — $268,000 over 4y, 85% of budgetHope585 Inc — $265,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetThe New School — $260,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $228,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHope for Youth Inc — $189,900 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPartnership For the Public Good Inc — $176,600 over 3y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF JEFFERSON COUNTY — $155,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC — $140,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC — $125,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $106,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWELFARE RESEARCH INC — $104,664 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC — $87,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budget914UNITED INC — $80,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetSAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRestoreforlife — $75,000 over 2y, 70% of budgetGATEWAY-LONGVIEW INC — $66,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC — $66,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BRONX DEFENDERS — $63,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES — $62,840 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY LIVING NY INC — $60,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetHILLSIDE FAMILY OF AGENCIES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF YONKERS — $47,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEWARK SCHOOL OF THE ARTS — $40,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSITA GROUP LTD ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds GRAHAM WINDHAM ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ALIA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN LTD ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PARSONS CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Erie County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING GREATNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope585 Inc ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Hope for Youth Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dave Thomas Foundatio…Mother Cabrini Health…The Ira Decamp Founda…Pinkerton FoundationThe New York Communit…Annie E Casey Foundat…Brooklyn Community Fo…Greater Rochester Hea…Central New York Comm…Robin Hood FoundationBorealis PhilanthropyRochester Area Commun…
Dave Thomas Foundation for AdoptionOH27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Ira Decamp Foundation Xxxxx2009 · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · Rochester Area Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Redlich Horwitz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Newark School of the Arts — 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Redlich Horwitz Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Redlich Horwitz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 181 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines