Skip to content
Redlich Horwitz Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Redlich Horwitz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$25M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$27MHuman Services$10MCrime & Legal$2.2MArts & Culture$1.6MCivil Rights$1.3MPublic Benefit$1.2MEducation$1.2MYouth Development$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $25M
$70,400
Median grant
7
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSITA GROUP LTD$25,000,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY$350,000
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS$200,000
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK$175,000
HOPE585$167,000
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL$132,000
WESTCHESTER COUNTY DPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES$125,000
THE NEW SCHOOL$110,000
FOSTERING GREATNESS INC$107,100
FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$100,000
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PA$94,445
CENTER FOR COURT INNOVATION$83,000
FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS$80,000
CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GATEWAY LONGVIEW: $67k → 13%Children's Home of Jefferson County: $75k → 14%You Gotta Believe: $88k → 20%Alia: $189k → 14%Alia: $100k → 14%The Children's Village: $170k → 9%ALIA: $70k → 14%The Children's Village: $137k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $67k → 9%The Children's Village: $110k → 9%ALIA: $100k → 14%FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS: $120k → 14%Fostering Change for Children: $113k → 7%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $98k → 9%FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS: $80k → 14%FOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN: $75k → 7%FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS: $80k → 14%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $322k → 20%Fostering Media Connections: $80k → 14%Heartshare St Vincent's Services: $156k → 20%Fostering Media Connections: $70k → 14%HOPE585: $167k → 14%Rising Ground: $100k → 20%THE HUB585: $59k → 14%RISING GROUND: $88k → 20%FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE: $320k → 14%Heartshare St Vincent's Services: $55k → 20%FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE: $290k → 14%FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE: $210k → 14%Parsons Child and Family Center: $155k → 14%FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE: $100k → 14%Parsons Child and Family Center: $80k → 14%Parsons Child and Family Center: $75k → 14%Families Together in New York State: $60k → 14%Good Shepherd Services: $100k → 17%Good Shepherd Services: $100k → 17%Graham Windham: $215k → 17%Graham Windham: $150k → 17%Graham Windham: $150k → 17%Graham Windham: $125k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $113k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $113k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $110k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $110k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $93k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $93k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
NY
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
NC
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 72 repeat orgs$27M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

72 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
97

Total granted

$19M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

54%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalEducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.3M · revenue +3%
  • FT
    FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +21%
  • AF
    ADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $883k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • AF
    ANU Family Services
    one grant, 2017 · $204k
  • FJ
    FAMILY JUSTICE LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $92k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
2
Avenues for Justice Inc

Avenues for justice operates a progressive diversion program for nyc court-involved and at-risk youth, ages 13 to 24, through adapted hybrid online and onsite programming, and 24/7 mentorship with community-based court advocates, the…

Crime & Legal
3
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
4
Little Flower Children Family Services of New York

Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…

Human Services
5
Friends of the Children- New York

Friends of the children - new york has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Crime & Legal
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA), New York City is a child

Civil Rights
7
Youth Justice Network Inc

Youth Justice Network (YJN)s mission is to break cycles of incarceration and build an equitable justice system by providing young people with individualized advocacy, mentorship, and opportunities to grow, thrive, and lead. (SEE SCHEDULE O)

Human Services
8
Advocates for Children of New York

To ensure a high quality education for new york students who face barriers to academic success, focusing on students from low-income backgrounds.

Crime & Legal
9
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
10
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
11
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
12
The Family Center Inc

Provide social, legal & behavioral health services to individuals and families affected by life-altering events.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Yorkers for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Insita Group Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 181 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/88
Grantees still filing
56/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INSITA GROUP LTD: $25,000,000 · PhilanthropyINSITA GROUP LTDTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $1,082,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $1,732,200 · Philanthropy+3 moreADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK: $882,820 · OtherADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMIL…Schuyler Center: $592,580 · OtherSchuyler CenterCENTER FOR COURT INNOVATION: $583,000 · OtherCENTER FOR COURT INNOVA…LEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $525,000 · OtherOnondago Cty Dept of Children Fam S: $410,767 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $375,000 · OtherBUILDING BRIDGES INITIATIVE: $343,000 · Other+115 more: $6,569,571 · Other+115 moreFAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE INC: $1,080,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES TOGETHE…GRAHAM WINDHAM: $840,000 · Human ServicesGRAHAM WINDHAMTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $798,459 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S A…THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $602,300 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S V…ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC: $583,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT'S SER…FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS: $530,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING MEDIA …ALIA: $509,012 · Human ServicesALIAFOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN LTD: $400,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING CHANGE…PARSONS CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER: $325,000 · Human ServicesRISING GROUND INC: $320,000 · Human ServicesHope585 Inc: $265,500 · Human Services+22 more: $967,334 · Human Services+22 moreNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,319,550 · Crime & LegalErie County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Project Inc: $300,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY JUSTICE LAW CENTER INC: $100,000 · Crime & LegalTHE BRONX DEFENDERS: $63,250 · Crime & Legal+5 more: $70,750 · Crime & LegalTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $468,000 · EducationThe New School: $260,000 · EducationSAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC: $75,000 · Education+4 more: $45,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC: $496,775 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $106,000 · Civil RightsBROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES: $62,840 · Civil RightsFOSTERING GREATNESS INC: $268,000 · Housing & ShelterFAIR SHARE HOUSING CENTER INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$27,814,200Other$10,281,738Human Services$7,220,605Crime & Legal$1,853,550Education$848,000Civil Rights$665,615Housing & Shelter$278,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSITA GROUP LTD: $25,000,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,319,550 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $1,082,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE INC: $1,080,000 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK: $882,820 over 8y, 22% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $872,200 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $855,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM: $840,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $798,459 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $602,300 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC: $583,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS: $530,000 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $525,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetALIA: $509,012 over 5y, 21% of budgetCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC: $496,775 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $468,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN LTD: $400,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES INITIATIVE: $343,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetPARSONS CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER: $325,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRISING GROUND INC: $320,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetErie County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Project Inc: $300,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetFOSTERING GREATNESS INC: $268,000 over 4y, 85% of budgetHope585 Inc: $265,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetThe New School: $260,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $228,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHope for Youth Inc: $189,900 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPartnership For the Public Good Inc: $176,600 over 3y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $155,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $140,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC: $125,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $106,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWELFARE RESEARCH INC: $104,664 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $87,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budget914UNITED INC: $80,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetSAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRestoreforlife: $75,000 over 2y, 70% of budgetGATEWAY-LONGVIEW INC: $66,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $66,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BRONX DEFENDERS: $63,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES: $62,840 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY LIVING NY INC: $60,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetHILLSIDE FAMILY OF AGENCIES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF YONKERS: $47,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEWARK SCHOOL OF THE ARTS: $40,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSITA GROUP LTD ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES TOGETHER IN NEW YORK STATE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds GRAHAM WINDHAM ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ALIA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN LTD ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PARSONS CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Erie County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING GREATNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope585 Inc ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Hope for Youth Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dave Thomas Foundatio…Mother Cabrini Health…The Ira Decamp Founda…Pinkerton FoundationThe New York Communit…Annie E Casey Foundat…Brooklyn Community Fo…Greater Rochester Hea…Central New York Comm…Robin Hood FoundationBorealis PhilanthropyRochester Area Commun…
Dave Thomas Foundation for AdoptionOH27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Ira Decamp Foundation Xxxxx2009 · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · Rochester Area Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Redlich Horwitz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Redlich Horwitz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Newark School of the Arts: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Redlich Horwitz Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Redlich Horwitz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 181 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Redlich Horwitz’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home