Skip to content
Realtor Foundation of Wake County at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Realtor Foundation of Wake County

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$382kHuman Services$145kYouth Development$53kCrime & Legal$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kReligion$23kHealth$18kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$553k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA$50,000
ARISE COLLECTIVE$25,000
HAVEN HOUSE$25,000
NC REALTORS HOUSING FOUNDATION$25,000
THE CARYING PLACE$25,000
DESIGNED FOR JOY$15,000
RALEIGH AREA LAND TRUST$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE WAKE COUNTY GAL$9,035
THE WOMEN'S CENTER$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HARNETT CTY$1,500
PERSEVERE COMMUNITY SERVICES$1,000
EMPOWERMENT INC$645
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMPOWERMENT INC: $645 → 13%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $1k → 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $500 → 8%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $25k → 8%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $15k → 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $500 → 8%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $10k → 8%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $4k → 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $500 → 8%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $1k → 8%GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $5k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$544k · 17 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
24

Total granted

$544k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+27%

Still filing today

76%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $148k · revenue +117%
  • THE CARYING PLACE INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $57k · revenue +837%
  • THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $55k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • UM
    URBAN MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • B
    BLOOMHERE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • PH
    PRESERVING HOME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +383%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homes of Hope Inc

Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.

Housing & Shelter
2
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
3
Durham Home Inc
—
4
Charlotte Family Housing

The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.

Human Services
5
Habitat for Humanity of Nc Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity of North Carolina…

Housing & Shelter
6
New Directions of Horry County Inc

To assist the needs of individuals, help them navigate past obstacles that prevent them from getting out of the cycle of homelessness and poverty, and assist them with achieving independent living.

Human Services
7
Restorative Transitions Inc

Re-entry Program in Durham NC

Crime & Legal
8
Safe Harbor of Nc Inc

Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…

Health
9
Ruths House

Provide a community owned and operated shelter for a safe haven from domestic violence for women and their children in beaufort county, nc. provide counseling and guidance to allow these women to make decisions about their future.

Crime & Legal
10
CaringWorks Inc

Caringworks' mission is to reduce homelessness and empower the marginalized by providing access to housing and services that foster dignity, self-sufficieny & well-being.

Human Services
11
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
12
Secu Family House At Unc Hospitals

Secu family house at unc hospitals provides an affordable, safe, nurturing home away from home for seriously ill patients, their family members, and caregivers from throughout north carolina and beyond.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Plm Families Together Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bloomhere. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA: $148,370 · Housing & ShelterCASATHE CARYING PLACE INC: $57,200 · Housing & ShelterTHE CARYING PLACE INCOAK CITY CARES INC: $48,000 · Housing & ShelterOAK CITY CARES INCFAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $31,591 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC+4 more: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter+4 moreTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $50,850 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INCNC REALTORS HOUSING FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherNC REALTORS HOUSING FOUNDATIONURBAN MINISTRIES: $25,000 · OtherURBAN MINISTRIESFRIENDS OF THE WAKE COUNTY GAL: $19,180 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WAKE COUNTY GALPLM FAMILIES TOGETHER INC: $17,567 · OtherPLM FAMILIES TOGETHER INCPARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS: $15,000 · OtherPARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESSBLOOMHERE: $10,000 · Other+20 more: $33,283 · Other+20 moreTHE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE CE…THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREEN C…A DOORWAY TO HOPE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesA DOORWAY T…INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $645 · Human ServicesHAVEN HOUSE INC: $50,880 · HealthHAVEN HOUSE…Fellowship Home of Raleigh: $15,000 · HealthFellowship …+1 more: $1,000 · HealthARISE COLLECTIVE INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalDesigned For Joy: $20,000 · ReligionCARROLLS KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · Employment
Housing & Shelter$305,161Other$195,880Human Services$69,145Health$66,880Crime & Legal$25,000Religion$20,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA: $148,370 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CARYING PLACE INC: $57,200 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $55,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $50,880 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $50,850 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC: $48,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $31,591 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetARISE COLLECTIVE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDesigned For Joy: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPLM FAMILIES TOGETHER INC: $17,567 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFellowship Home of Raleigh: $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBLOOMHERE: $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetRALEIGH AREA LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPRESERVING HOME INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA DOORWAY TO HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDHIC Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARROLLS KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNCAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRealtors Relief Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD'S TABLE SOUP KITCHEN INC: $2,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHATHAM OUTREACH ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES MOVING FORWARD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREALITY MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM CRISIS RESPONSE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARING HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS HELPING EACH ADOLESCENT REACH THEIR SPARK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWERMENT INC: $645 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…North Carolina Commun…United Way of the Gre…John William Pope Fou…Truist Foundation IncThe Leon Levine Found…The Stewards FundDuke UniversityDuke Energy FoundationDuke University Healt…Credit Suisse America…The Cannon Foundation…
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC51.9× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · John William Pope Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Stewards Fund · Duke University · Duke Energy Foundation · Duke University Health System Inc · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Realtor Foundation of Wake County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Realtor Foundation of Wake County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Realtor Foundation of Wake County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home