Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stewards Fund

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2021
50
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202021.

Housing & Shelter$2.1MHealth$854kHuman Services$649kYouth Development$451kFood & Nutrition$321kReligion$283kEducation$84kScience & Tech$21kOther$0
02FY2021 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k16 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $466k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $697k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA$500,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ORANGE$250,000
HEALING TRANSITIONS$150,000
URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM COUNTY$104,600
HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE$100,000
INTERFAITH COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICES$71,677
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY WAKE$71,250
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS OF THE TRIANGLE$71,163
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ORANGE$69,233
INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE$58,645
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM & ORANGE$48,055
FAMILIES MOVING FORWARD$42,602
SENIOR PHARMASSIST$40,428
HEALING TRANSITIONS$40,000
HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE$33,814
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $62k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $59k → 8%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $10k → 8%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $10k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $5k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $5k → 8%RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 8%SOUTHEAST RALEIGH PROMISE: $10k → 8%THE ENCOURAGING PLACE: $5k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $12k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $12k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 21 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
15

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+4%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $673k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $434k · revenue +50%
  • IC
    INTER-FAITH COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $432k · revenue +0%
  • HEALING TRANSITIONS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $233k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TR
    TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $400k · revenue +5%
  • HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $226k · revenue +62%
  • ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $98k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Durham Community Land Trustees Inc

Build strong communities by developing, managing, and advocating for permanent affordable housing that provides durham residents with low to moderate incomes a stable foundation for achieving economic security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Restorative Transitions Inc

Re-entry Program in Durham NC

Crime & Legal
3
Family Promise of Davie County

To help families experiencing homelessness and low-income families achieve sustainable independence through a community based response

Housing & Shelter
4
Homes of Hope Inc

Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.

Housing & Shelter
5
Stepup Durham

Stepup partners with adults to transform their lives through training in life and employment skills.

Human Services
6
Raleigh County Community Action Association Inc

Raleigh county community action association, inc. empowers individuals and families to reach their highest levels of social and economical self-sufficiency, while identifying and eliminating causes of poverty. rccaa provides direct…

Human Services
7
Durham Home Inc
8
Wake County Continuum of Care Dba Raleigh-Wake Partnership to End and Prev

Our mission is to leverage the power of community to address systemic causes of homelessness through coordinated response, education, data, and advocacy.

Housing & Shelter
9
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
10
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
11
Secu Family House At Unc Hospitals

Secu family house at unc hospitals provides an affordable, safe, nurturing home away from home for seriously ill patients, their family members, and caregivers from throughout north carolina and beyond.

Health
12
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Plm Families Together Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Encouraging Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Senior HousingYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Academic Support Prog…Basic Needs & Crisis SupportResidential Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%9%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr14%38%20–35yr12%22%35–55yr9%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%1%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr14%61%20–35yr12%16%35–55yr9%14%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
15%
1,244/8,495

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTER-FAITH COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICE INC — $432,126 · OtherINTER-FAITH COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICE INCTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC — $399,902 · OtherTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ORANGE — $392,110 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ORANGEURBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM COUNTY — $275,002 · OtherURBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM COUNTYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INC — $225,704 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY WAKE — $147,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY WAKEFAMILIES MOVING FORWARD — $97,446 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $94,770 · Other+26 more — $584,760 · Other+26 moreCASA — $500,000 · Housing & ShelterCASAHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE — $434,406 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING FOR NEW HOPEPASSAGE HOME INC — $58,035 · Housing & ShelterPASSAGE HOME INCFAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $39,550 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterHEALING TRANSITIONS INC — $232,500 · HealthHEALING TR…ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC — $98,078 · HealthALLIANCE M…SENIOR PHARMASSIST INC — $82,984 · HealthSENIOR PHA…SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $40,228 · HealthSAMARITAN …INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $135,376 · Human ServicesURBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $57,782 · Human ServicesTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $34,142 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC — $25,059 · Human ServicesSE RALEIGH PROMISE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TRIANGLE INC — $146,071 · Youth DevelopmentDURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE — $70,297 · Youth DevelopmentNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES — $42,580 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDENT U — $83,875 · EducationMeals on Wheels of Durham Inc — $55,199 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,649,320Housing & Shelter$1,046,991Health$453,790Human Services$277,359Youth Development$258,948Education$83,875Food & Nutrition$55,199

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASA — $500,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE — $434,406 over 2y, 12% of budgetINTER-FAITH COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICE INC — $432,126 over 2y, 11% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC — $399,902 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHEALING TRANSITIONS INC — $232,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INC — $225,704 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TRIANGLE INC — $146,071 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $135,376 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC — $98,078 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetFAMILIES MOVING FORWARD — $97,446 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSTUDENT U — $83,875 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetSENIOR PHARMASSIST INC — $82,984 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetPLM FAMILIES TOGETHER INC — $74,900 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPASSAGE HOME INC — $58,035 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetURBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $57,782 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Durham Inc — $55,199 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES — $50,585 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES — $42,580 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetSAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $40,228 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $39,550 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetKIDZNOTES INC — $39,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $34,142 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPartners for Youth Opportunity — $30,064 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUND — $29,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC — $25,059 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWake Enterprises Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSE RALEIGH PROMISE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDHIC Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGirls on the Run of the Triangle Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Encouraging Place — $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK GIRLS RUN FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC53.8× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · Duke University Health System Inc · Duke University · Duke Energy Foundation · Aj Fletcher Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Carolinas Credit Union Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Realtor Foundation of Wake County · The Mary Duke Biddle Foundation Missionpost Pmb #101

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stewards Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stewards Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Stewards Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph