· Private foundation
Rdm Positive Impact Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION | $666,666 |
| SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUITY FOUNDATI | $320,000 |
| WCN CARES FOUNDATION | $298,877 |
| TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| INTERFAITH OF THE WOODLANDS | $47,130 |
| ANGEL REACH | $45,495 |
| THE WABASH VALLEY FAMILY SPORTS CEN | $25,000 |
| BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS EL DORADO C | $20,706 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNI | $17,125 |
| ALSCURE | $17,000 |
| TBX4LIFE | $12,247 |
| TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION | $7,718 |
| EDSO THRIVE WITH 10-35 | $5,970 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| POWERHOUSE MINISTRIES | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCASA Child Advocates of Montgomery County Inc6× · 2018–2023 · $545k · revenue +56%
- WRWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC6× · 2017–2024 · $513k · revenue +2%
- TRTHE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2023 · $500k · revenue +20% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
- WCWCN CARESone grant, 2023 · $312k · 98% of their budget
- TCTX CHRISTIAN UNIVERSTIYone grant, 2021 · $210k
- WHWILLIAM HERNDON RESEARCH FNDone grant, 2017 · $118k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.
To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspiration Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mr October Foundation for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sacramento Region Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CASA Child Advocates of Montgomery County Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANGEL REACH ↗
- Who funds THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WCN CARES ↗
- Who funds HANDS FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATION RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Love Fosters Hope ↗
- Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds The Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
- Who funds CHORDOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wcn Cares · Shell USA Company Foundation · Junior League of the Woodlands Inc · The Woodforest Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Hillcrest Foundation · Montgomery County Community Foundation · Texas Children's Hospital · United Way of Greater Houston · Strake Foundation · The Arena Energy Foundation · Waste Not Want Not
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rdm Positive Impact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.