Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rdm Positive Impact Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$667k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$3.1MHuman Services$3.0MEducation$2.0MPhilanthropy$1.0MReligion$668kCrime & Legal$651kRecreation & Sports$649kYouth Development$522kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$12,247
Median grant
11
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$666,666
SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUITY FOUNDATI$320,000
WCN CARES FOUNDATION$298,877
TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION$60,000
INTERFAITH OF THE WOODLANDS$47,130
ANGEL REACH$45,495
THE WABASH VALLEY FAMILY SPORTS CEN$25,000
BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS EL DORADO C$20,706
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNI$17,125
ALSCURE$17,000
TBX4LIFE$12,247
TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION$7,718
EDSO THRIVE WITH 10-35$5,970
MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK$5,000
POWERHOUSE MINISTRIES$3,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PRIDE INDUSTRIES: $10k → 6%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $20k → 17%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $15k → 13%YOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $500 → 8%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $30k → 9%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $20k → 9%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $10k → 9%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $10k → 9%HANDS FOR HOPE: $50k → 8%HANDS FOR HOPE: $31k → 8%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $5k → 9%HANDS FOR HOPE: $31k → 8%HANDS FOR HOPE: $30k → 8%HANDS FOR HOPE: $30k → 8%KIDS MEALS: $25k → 16%KIDS MEALS: $15k → 16%KIDS MEALS: $15k → 16%KIDS MEALS: $10k → 16%KIDS MEALS: $10k → 16%MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES: $100k → 9%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $30k → 9%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $20k → 9%WCN CARES: $312k → 9%PANTHER CREEK INSPIRATION RANCH: $110k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $100k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $100k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $75k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $75k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $45k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $35k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.0M · 38 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
80

Total granted

$8.0M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+2%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CASA Child Advocates of Montgomery County Inc
    6× · 2018–2023 · $545k · revenue +56%
  • WR
    WOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $513k · revenue +2%
  • TR
    THE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $500k · revenue +20% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • WC
    WCN CARES
    one grant, 2023 · $312k · 98% of their budget
  • TC
    TX CHRISTIAN UNIVERSTIY
    one grant, 2021 · $210k
  • WH
    WILLIAM HERNDON RESEARCH FND
    one grant, 2017 · $118k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
6
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
7
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

Health
8
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
10
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
11
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
12
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspiration Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mr October Foundation for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyEquine Therapy ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportAnimal Rescue and ShelterIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Lgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesCommunity FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…School District FoundationsCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%7%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr13%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%7%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr10%47%35–55yr13%4%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/72
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,732

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/68
Grantees still filing
39/68
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOPE THE WILL HERNDON FOUNDATION — $850,000 · OtherHOPE THE WILL HERNDON FOUNDATIONBOARD OF REGENTS UC DAVIS — $830,000 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS UC DAVISTHE MONARCH SCHOOL INSTITUTE — $740,608 · OtherTHE MONARCH SCHOOL INSTITUTEBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS EL DORADO C — $720,005 · OtherBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS EL DORADO CIndividual grant recipient — $625,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYES TO YOUTH — $400,000 · OtherYES TO YOUTHWCN CARES FOUNDATION — $298,877 · Other+86 more — $2,444,593 · Other+86 moreSacramento Region Community Foundation — $870,000 · PhilanthropySacramento Regio…THE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION — $500,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ROGER CLEMEN…THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC — $388,500 · PhilanthropyTHE TOBY KEITH F…+4 more — $51,000 · PhilanthropyANGEL REACH — $430,495 · Human ServicesANGEL REACHWCN CARES — $311,629 · Human ServicesWCN CARESHANDS FOR HOPE — $171,948 · Human ServicesHANDS FOR HO…INSPIRATION RANCH INC — $121,825 · Human ServicesINSPIRATION …MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES — $100,000 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY C…Love Fosters Hope — $75,000 · Human ServicesLove Fosters…KIDS' MEALS INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS …Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center — $50,000 · Human Services+4 more — $45,500 · Human ServicesTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $666,666 · HealthCHORDOMA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Health+8 more — $77,102 · HealthCASA Child Advocates of Montgomery County Inc — $545,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $50,000 · Civil RightsWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC — $512,590 · Community ImprovementThe Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff — $70,304 · EducationCHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUISVILLE INC — $59,260 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $50,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $26,000 · EducationBEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION — $18,670 · EducationLIL WILDCAT EDUCATION CENTER INC — $15,000 · EducationFreedom From Unnecessary Negatives — $10,000 · EducationMr October Foundation for Kids — $10,000 · Education
Other$6,909,083Philanthropy$1,809,500Human Services$1,381,397Health$793,768Civil Rights$595,000Community Improvement$512,590Education$259,234

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSacramento Region Community Foundation — $870,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $666,666 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA Child Advocates of Montgomery County Inc — $545,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC — $512,590 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 7y, 33% of budgetANGEL REACH — $430,495 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetTHE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC — $388,500 over 4y, 15% of budgetWCN CARES — $311,629 over 1y, 98% of budgetHANDS FOR HOPE — $171,948 over 5y, 21% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $130,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINSPIRATION RANCH INC — $121,825 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES — $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLove Fosters Hope — $75,000 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff — $70,304 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUISVILLE INC — $59,260 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHORDOMA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCrisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center — $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSH BECKETT FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetMending Arrow Ranch — $30,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetWarfighter Overwatch — $28,405 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Houston Golf Charity — $24,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOVE146 INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHATTANOOGA ROOM IN THE INN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION — $18,670 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $17,125 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMemorial Hermann Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIL WILDCAT EDUCATION CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetREAL LIFE REAL MUSIC FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 2y, 76% of budgetTBX4LIFE — $12,247 over 1y, 12% of budgetPRIDE Industries — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Lady of the Lake Foundation — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORONADO FOURTH OF JULY — $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFreedom From Unnecessary Negatives — $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetDETACHABLE CONTAINER ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sacramento Region Community Foundation
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
  • Who funds CASA Child Advocates of Montgomery County Inc
  • Who funds WOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds THE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANGEL REACH
  • Who funds THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WCN CARES
  • Who funds HANDS FOR HOPE
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds INSPIRATION RANCH INC
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds Love Fosters Hope
  • Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC
  • Who funds The Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUISVILLE INC
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC
  • Who funds CHORDOMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wcn CaresTX26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wcn Cares · Shell USA Company Foundation · Junior League of the Woodlands Inc · The Woodforest Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Hillcrest Foundation · Montgomery County Community Foundation · Texas Children's Hospital · United Way of Greater Houston · Strake Foundation · The Arena Energy Foundation · Waste Not Want Not

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rdm Positive Impact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • LOVE146 Inc49% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph