Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Tennessee · Nonprofit

Mending Arrow Ranch

Mending Arrow Ranch (Tennessee) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $63,049 to it, the largest being RDM POSITIVE IMPACT FOUNDATION ($30,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$109k
Revenue FY2025
8
Funders on record
$63k
Grants received
$108k
Net assets
2/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 37%

Against its field

Mending Arrow Ranch runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 9,643 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin23% · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)32% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,643 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($12k) Expenses 100 ($10k) Net assets 100 ($3k)2018 Revenue 329 ($38k) Expenses 261 ($27k) Net assets 517 ($14k)2019 Revenue 334 ($39k) Expenses 451 ($46k) Net assets 219 ($6k)2020 Revenue 413 ($48k) Expenses 399 ($41k) Net assets 468 ($12k)2021 Revenue 656 ($76k) Expenses 590 ($61k) Net assets 1033 ($27k)2022 Revenue 682 ($79k) Expenses 579 ($60k) Net assets 1749 ($47k)2023 Revenue 987 ($114k) Expenses 672 ($69k) Net assets 3431 ($91k)2024 Revenue 650 ($75k) Expenses 808 ($83k) Net assets 3120 ($83k)2025 Revenue 940 ($109k) Expenses 813 ($84k) Net assets 4051 ($108k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (940)Expenses (813)Net assets (4051)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

95% of Mending Arrow Ranch’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,078 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1k
17
$11k
18
$8k
19
$7k
20
$15k
21
$19k
22
$45k
23
$8k
24
$25k
25
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $100 → $42k.

2 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Mending Arrow Ranch’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Mending Arrow Ranch leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

48%
largest funder
83%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 85% · 2021 81% · 2022 81% · 2023 71%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of Mending Arrow Ranch's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 25% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Mending Arrow Ranch draws 62% of its grant income from funders outside Tennessee, across 4 states in all.

IL
TN
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
23
Tennessee out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Mending Arrow Ranch

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Tennessee

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

63%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Mending Arrow Ranch: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Mending Arrow Ranch?
Mending Arrow Ranch (Tennessee) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $63,049 to it, the largest being RDM POSITIVE IMPACT FOUNDATION ($30,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Mending Arrow Ranch have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $63,049 in grants to Mending Arrow Ranch, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Mending Arrow Ranch?
RDM POSITIVE IMPACT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $30,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Mending Arrow Ranch find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Tennessee. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing