· Public charity
Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc
Support the oklahoma city community foundation via charitable contributions to non-profit entities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $91,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $137,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $10,000 |
| INTEGRIS HOSPICE | $10,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $10,000 |
| YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY | $10,000 |
| CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN | $7,500 |
| POSITIVE TOMORROWS | $7,500 |
| OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC | $7,500 |
| PIVOT INC | $7,500 |
| THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY (TEEM) | $7,500 |
| REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YWYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +94%
- IHINTEGRIS Hospice Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +10%
CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN7× · 2019–2025 · $53k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- HMHEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -87%
- MMMobile Meals of Oklahoma County Incone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…
The Cardinal Community House is a resource dedicated to assisting individuals experiencing homelessness. Our work is to address urgent critical needs, like housing, while addressing underlying concerns to bring about life-changing…
To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…
We help people overcome challenges to employment.
To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.
To serve those who are experiencing or at risk for homelessness.
Our mission is rooted in the belief that meaningful relationships restore communities. through relational service and dignified housing solutions, we work to help people move from surviving to thriving.
Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.
The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Mobile Meals of Oklahoma County Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Arnall Family Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Feed the Children Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc?
Find your warmest path to Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.