Skip to content
Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

Support the oklahoma city community foundation via charitable contributions to non-profit entities.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$123kHealth$90kFood & Nutrition$84kPhilanthropy$75kHousing & Shelter$45kEmployment$23kYouth Development$23kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $91,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $137,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY$10,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$10,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
INTEGRIS HOSPICE$10,000
OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$7,500
HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC$7,500
PIVOT INC$7,500
THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY (TEEM)$7,500
CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN$7,500
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$7,500
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%YWCA Of Oklahoma City: $10k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%YWCA Of Oklahoma City: $10k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $10k → 16%YWCA Of Oklahoma City: $10k → 16%PIVOT INC: $8k → 16%PIVOT INC: $8k → 16%PIVOT INC: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 10 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$379k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

90%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    INTEGRIS Hospice Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +10%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +94%
  • CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $53k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • HM
    HEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -87%
  • MM
    Mobile Meals of Oklahoma County Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
2
Oklahoma Halfway House Inc

The Cardinal Community House is a resource dedicated to assisting individuals experiencing homelessness. Our work is to address urgent critical needs, like housing, while addressing underlying concerns to bring about life-changing…

Health
3
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
4
Convenience Distributors Ok
—
5
Goodwill Industries of Central Oklahoma Inc

We help people overcome challenges to employment.

Employment
6
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
7
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Tulsa Day Center Inc

To serve those who are experiencing or at risk for homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
9
The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma

Our mission is rooted in the belief that meaningful relationships restore communities. through relational service and dignified housing solutions, we work to help people move from surviving to thriving.

Human Services
10
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
11
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
12
Missing and Murdered Indigenous People Central Oklahoma Chapter
Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $70,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASS…PIVOT INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCHEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVE…CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN: $52,500 · OtherCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDRENST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHU…Mobile Meals of Oklahoma County Inc: $8,000 · OtherMobile Meals of Oklahoma Count…THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY INC: $22,500 · OtherTHE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT M…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSECONVOY OF HOPE: $10,000 · OtherCONVOY OF HOPEOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $52,500 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA CITY COMMU…United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $30,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Centr…INTEGRIS Hospice Inc: $70,000 · HealthINTEGRIS Hospice…REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $42,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL …POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $22,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $22,500 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$112,500Other$127,000Philanthropy$82,500Health$70,000Food & Nutrition$42,000Youth Development$22,500Housing & Shelter$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTEGRIS Hospice Inc: $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN: $52,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $52,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $42,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPIVOT INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY MINDS HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMobile Meals of Oklahoma County Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Servant FoundationHarris Foundation IncKirkpatrick Family Af…El and Thelma Gaylord…Communities Foundatio…McLaughlin Family Fou…Arnall Family Foundat…Sarkeys FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…The Anne and Henry Za…Feed the Children Inc
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Arnall Family Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Feed the Children Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc?

Find your warmest path to Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Raymond H Jr & Bonnie B Hefner Family Affiliated Fund of Occf’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home