Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raymond B Pinson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$367k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$3.7MPhilanthropy$356kHealth$293kEducation$226kInternational$222kYouth Development$158kCommunity Improvement$150kHuman Services$97kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $548k
  • $250k+1 grant · $367k
$12,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN LIFE MISSIONS$367,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN$200,000
Individual grant recipient$178,000
CENTER OF STUDIES IN GLOBAL CHRISTIANITY$100,000
HEART OF AFRICA$70,000
URBAN VENTURES$20,000
THE HOUSE CHURCH$20,000
KINGDOM IN ACTION FAMILY$20,000
MN ADULT TEEN CHALLENGE$20,000
DIGNITY FOR THE AMPUTEE INT'L$20,000
MERCIFUL RECOVERY COUNSELING & COACHING$20,000
MOTHERS CHOICE USA$20,000
GLOBAL MISSION AWARENESS$15,000
BEN FERRELL MINISTRIES$15,000
CHRIST CHURCH$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%BREAKTHROUGH MINISTRIES: $20k → 6%MOTHERS CHOICE USA: $20k → 12%MOTHERS CHOICE USA: $15k → 12%BREAKTHROUGH MINISTRIES: $20k → 6%MOTHERS CHOICE USA INC: $15k → 12%MOTHERS CHOICE USA INC: $15k → 12%BREAKTHROUGH MINISTRIES: $20k → 6%BREAKTHROUGH MINISTRIES: $12k → 6%MAD DADS OF MINNEAPOLIS: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
OR
OH
CA
CO
NE
KY
AZ
HI
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 38 repeat orgs$663k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
16

Total granted

$4.6M
$306k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-2%

Still filing today

39%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $357k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HE
    HARVEST EVANGELISM INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +7%
  • CL
    CHRISTIAN LIFE MISSIONS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $591k · revenue +161% · 90% of their budget
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $355k · revenue ×103

Funded once

  • CL
    Christian Life Ministries
    one grant, 2023 · $145k · revenue -4%
  • MA
    MARKETPLACE APPRENTICE PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $80k
  • MD
    MAD DADS of Minneapolis
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Explore God Network
—
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Christian Adventures International Inc

Evangelism; Evangelism Training; Global Outreach Global Advancement of the Gospel through Tent Ministries and Conferences Television and Literature Distribution

Religion
5
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
6
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
7
Christian Mens Network

CMN works to stop fatherlessness, child abuse, and human trafficking by equipping and training men and pastors in a global movement that for over 40 years has restored families and built churches.

Religion
8
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
9
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
10
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
11
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
12
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Storks; the most unlike its peers is University of Wisconsin-Superior Alumni Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVEST EVANGELISM INC: $1,188,000 · OtherHARVEST EVANGELISM INCCHRISTIAN LIFE MISSIONS: $591,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN LIFE MISSIONSRIVER VALLEY CHURCH: $291,000 · OtherRIVER VALLEY CHURCHTHE HOUSE CHURCH: $217,000 · OtherTHE HOUSE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $215,022 · OtherIndividual grant recipientChristian Life Ministries: $145,000 · OtherURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSION: $136,000 · Other+37 more: $1,015,741 · Other+37 moreNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $355,000 · PhilanthropyHEART OF AFRICIA INC: $222,000 · InternationalDIGNITY FOR THE AMPUTEE INTERNATIONAL: $110,000 · HealthMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $50,000 · HealthSCAD RESEARCH INC: $30,000 · HealthSave the Storks: $23,000 · HealthCENTER FOR STUDIES IN GLOBAL CHRISTIANITY INC: $100,000 · ReligionGlobal Mission Awareness: $55,000 · ReligionITN MINNESOTA: $33,900 · ReligionChris Mikkelson Evangelistic Ministries: $12,000 · ReligionRELEASING GENERATIONS: $10,000 · ReligionUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $200,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH MINISTRIES INC: $72,000 · Human ServicesMOTHERS CHOICE USA INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesMAD DADS of Minneapolis: $20,000 · Human ServicesMATTER: $14,800 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,938,763Philanthropy$355,000International$222,000Health$213,000Religion$210,900Education$200,000Human Services$157,000Food & Nutrition$14,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARVEST EVANGELISM INC: $1,188,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetCHRISTIAN LIFE MISSIONS: $591,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetHEART OF AFRICIA INC: $222,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChristian Life Ministries: $145,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetDIGNITY FOR THE AMPUTEE INTERNATIONAL: $110,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetCENTER FOR STUDIES IN GLOBAL CHRISTIANITY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH MINISTRIES INC: $72,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetMOTHERS CHOICE USA INC: $65,000 over 4y, 81% of budgetGlobal Mission Awareness: $55,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetITN MINNESOTA: $33,900 over 3y, 100% of budgetSCAD RESEARCH INC: $30,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSave the Storks: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAD DADS of Minneapolis: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC: $15,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetMATTER: $14,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPro-Life Action Ministries Inc: $13,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetChris Mikkelson Evangelistic Ministries: $12,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARVEST EVANGELISM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LIFE MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF AFRICIA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds Christian Life Ministries ↗
  • Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIGNITY FOR THE AMPUTEE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR STUDIES IN GLOBAL CHRISTIANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS CHOICE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Mission Awareness ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds ITN MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds SCAD RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Save the Storks ↗
  • Who funds MAD DADS of Minneapolis ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN13.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond B Pinson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond B Pinson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raymond B Pinson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph