Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ray & Diana Martin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$78kEducation$11kHuman Services$8kInternational$5kPhilanthropy$4kPublic Benefit$3kReligion$3kHealth$900Recreation & Sports$150Other$59k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$338k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALOS VERDES PERFORMING ARTS$12,500
ROLLING HILLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
Barbara Sinara Children's Center$1,000
PALOS VERDES ART CENTER$1,000
CHILDCARE WORLDWIDE$1,000
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL CENTERTRINITYCARE HOSPICE FUDR$1,000
THE VOLUNTEER CENTER$1,000
TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$1,000
SAN PEDRO PENINSULA CANCER GUILD$500
Fisher House Southern California$500
Smile Train$250
Friends of Banning Museum$150
Palos Verdes Historical Society$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $1k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $1k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$164k · 20 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$164k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+1%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    PALOS VERDES PERFORMING ARTS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $73k · revenue +118%
  • PL
    PENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +114%
  • TN
    TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • CC
    COMMUNITYS CHILD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $250 · revenue +1%
  • AA
    Alzheimer's Association
    one grant, 2020 · $150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
5
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
6
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

10
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
11
Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital

The hospital's mission is to elevate the health status of the communities served.

Health
12
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Southern California Inc and the most unlike its peers is San Pedro Peninsula Cancer Guild. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PALOS VERDES PERFORMING ARTS — $72,500 · Arts & CulturePALOS VERDES PERFORMING ARTSPalos Verdes Art Center Beverly G Alpay Center for Arts Education — $5,250 · Arts & CulturePalos Verdes Art Center Beverly G Alpay Center for …ROLLING HILLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $35,520 · OtherROLLING HILLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY — $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARYTHE VOLUNTEER CENTER — $5,000 · OtherTHE VOLUNTEER CENTERPROVIDENCE MEDICAL CENTERTRINITYCARE HOSPICE FUDR — $5,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE MEDICAL CENTERTRINITYCARE HOSP…BARBARA SINATRA CHILDREN'S CENTER — $3,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $3,000 · Other+12 more — $6,200 · Other+12 morePENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $700 · EducationTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesChildcare Worldwide — $5,000 · InternationalSAN PEDRO PENINSULA CANCER GUILD — $3,150 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $700 · PhilanthropyFISHER HOUSE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $3,000 · Public Benefit
Arts & Culture$77,750Other$62,720Education$10,700Human Services$8,000International$5,000Philanthropy$3,850Public Benefit$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPALOS VERDES PERFORMING ARTS — $72,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPalos Verdes Art Center Beverly G Alpay Center for Arts Education — $5,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildcare Worldwide — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN PEDRO PENINSULA CANCER GUILD — $3,150 over 5y, 29% of budgetFISHER HOUSE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPeninsula Seniors — $1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITYS CHILD INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PALOS VERDES PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds PENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
  • Who funds Palos Verdes Art Center Beverly G Alpay Center for Arts Education
  • Who funds Childcare Worldwide
  • Who funds SAN PEDRO PENINSULA CANCER GUILD
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Peninsula Seniors
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITYS CHILD INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Oarsmen Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ray & Diana Martin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ray & Diana Martin Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ray & Diana Martin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph