Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rave Foundation

To build small fields for free play and invest in programs that use soccer as a vehicle to inspire youth and strengthen communities.

$230k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$139kPublic Safety & Disaster$88kYouth Development$42kCommunity Improvement$35kEducation$30kHousing & Shelter$30kArts & Culture$28kPublic Benefit$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $160,068 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $229,959 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $69,891 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOC$30,000
DRAGONS FC$16,145
CHIEF LESCHI SCHOOLS$10,000
SEATTLE PARKS FDN$10,000
COCREATIVE CULTURE$7,500
CITY OF TUKWILA$7,500
AMERICA SCORES$7,500
RAT CITY FC$7,500
INTERCITY SOCCER LEAGUE$7,500
CITY OF PASCO$7,500
YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE$7,500
AFRCN YOUNG DRMERS EMPMNT PROG INTL$7,500
CONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK$7,500
CITY OF BURIEN$7,500
YMCA OF PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES$7,480
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA OF PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $7k → 9%AFRCN YOUNG DRMERS EMPMNT PROG INTL: $8k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $8k → 9%CONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93k · 4 repeat orgs$379k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
33

Total granted

$93k
$249k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
0%

Still filing today

100%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue -10%
  • CU
    Cultures United
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k
  • PC
    POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE
    2× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • TA
    The Alliance for Pioneer Square
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -1%
  • CI
    CHINATOWN INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • TA
    THE ASIA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nido Aguila Club America Seattle

Train youth and young adults in the techniques of soccer to improve and enhance the caliber and representation of regional, state, national and international play in the sport of soccer. educe and combat community deterioration, juvenile…

Recreation & Sports
2
Seattle United Fc

Soccer club that brings premier and select teams under one management. league play and academy training for all players.

3
Seattle Youth Soccer Association

Provide organized soccer for the youth in seattle

Recreation & Sports
4
Northwest United Fc

Northwest United is a premier youth soccer club serving Skagit County and surrounding areas. As one of the top clubs in the Pacific Northwest, we have grown to 41 teams across boys and girls' divisions, offering year-round development for…

Recreation & Sports
5
King County Play Equity Coalition

King County Play Equity Coalition is a network of organizations dedicated to challenging and changing systems to shift power and center physical activity as a key part of health and youth development.

Youth Development
6
Pacific Northwest Soccer Club

PacNW offers top-level soccer training and development opportunities for players aged U8 through U19, all of whom are trained using the club's deliberate, integrated, long-term plan for player development.

Recreation & Sports
7
Lake Washington Youth Soccer Association

To provide opportunities for all youths under the age of 19 develop character and play affiliated soccer at a level commensurate with their ability and interest.

Recreation & Sports
8
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
9
Portland Youth Soccer Association

To provide the youth of Portland area communities with the opportunity to experience the joy and thrill of soccer in a player centered environment. The main focus is on FUN and DEVELOPMENT with age appropriate training and coaching where…

Recreation & Sports
10
Eastside Football Club

To create an environment for youth soccer players that provides the highest level of training, competition, and player development in the state of washington.

Recreation & Sports
11
North Portland Soccer Club

North Portland Soccer Clubs mission is to serve our diverse community through building interest in youth soccer and making it more accessible. We provide a safe and fun environment for players to develop skills that help them find…

Recreation & Sports
12
United Pdx Soccer Club

Develop young people for the challenges and opportunities of life through the game of soccer.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Parks Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cultures United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Baseball & Softball L…Regional Economic Developme…Youth Mentoring & Developme…Fraternal Service LodgesProfessional Trade Associat…Food Banks and Hunger ReliefUnion Health & Welfare Trus…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%15%<5yr15%11%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr19%33%20–35yr12%4%35–55yr12%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%12%<5yr15%12%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr12%11%35–55yr12%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/38
the rest of the field
14%
1,718/12,701

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
10/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Cultures United — $24,905 · OtherCultures UnitedDRAGONS FC — $16,145 · OtherDRAGONS FCTHE ASIA FOUNDATION — $12,000 · OtherChief Leschi Schools — $10,000 · OtherTACOMA PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $10,000 · OtherEarthGen Fka WA Green Schools — $12,960 · Other+31 more — $179,588 · Other+31 moreWASHINGTON STATE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $35,000 · Recreation & SportsWASHINGTON STATE…SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSEATTLE PARKS FO…JIMI HENDRIX PARK FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsJIMI HENDRIX PAR…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY — $9,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS AND GIRLS C…WASHINGTON YOUTH SOCCER FOUNDATION — $7,500 · Recreation & SportsWASHINGTON YOUTH…The Alliance for Pioneer Square — $25,000 · Community ImprovementSODO Business Improvement Area — $10,000 · Community ImprovementCHINATOWN INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterCAMPUS OF LEARNERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK — $7,500 · Human ServicesAFRICAN YOUNG DREAMERS EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INTL — $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $7,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES — $7,480 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $20,000 · EducationNORTHWEST AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM — $10,000 · Arts & CultureEXPERIENCE LEARNING COMMUNITY — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$275,598Recreation & Sports$71,500Community Improvement$35,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Human Services$29,980Education$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWASHINGTON STATE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Alliance for Pioneer Square — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHINATOWN INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCultures United — $24,905 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEarthGen Fka WA Green Schools — $12,960 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJIMI HENDRIX PARK FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSODO Business Improvement Area — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEXPERIENCE LEARNING COMMUNITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON YOUTH SOCCER FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetCONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCocreative Culture — $7,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAFRICAN YOUNG DREAMERS EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INTL — $7,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICA SCORES SEATTLE — $7,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES — $7,480 over 1y, 0.0% of budget90 PLUS PROJECT — $6,028 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON — $5,645 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington State Legends of Soccer — $5,415 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCAMPUS OF LEARNERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA19.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Artsfund · School's Out Washington · Good Sports Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rave Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rave Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rave Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph