Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rasheed Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$468kReligion$125kFood & Nutrition$93kHuman Services$30kPhilanthropy$22kCivil Rights$10kEducation$9kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $77k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$921k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SERVING HUMANITY$45,000
ADAMS CENTER$32,000
BEHBUD USA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WMCIR$4,000
DAR AL-HIJRAH ISLAMIC CENTER$3,000
DALLAS ISLAMIC FOUNDATION$3,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES$3,000
CGH HEALTH FOUNDATION$3,000
CHURCH OF THE OPEN DOOR FOOD PANTRY$3,000
ICNA RELIEF USA$3,000
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES$2,800
HELPING HANDS USA$2,155
MUSLIM STUDENTS FOR RELIEF$2,000
ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF CLINTON$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INDIAN MUSLIM RELIEF & CHARITIES: $1k → 8%INDIAN MUSLIM RELIEF & CHARITIES: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
SC
DC
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$743k · 30 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
15

Total granted

$743k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+50%

Still filing today

30%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    6× · 2018–2023 · $11k · revenue +38%
  • C
    CelebrateMercy
    2× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +31%
  • UC
    United Care International
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IC
    ISLAMIC CENTER OF MACOMB
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • RR
    RIYO RAAC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Cambodian Islamic Foundation
Education
3
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
4
Masjidullah Incorporated

The mission of Masjidullah is to establish the Holy Qur'an as the guide book for all of humanity and the life of prophet Muhammad as the example for human conduct. Masjidullah carries out its mission through programs of community service…

Religion
5
Islamic Society of Midwest Inc

The advancement of Religion and the elimination of prejudice and discrimination based on religious beliefs

Religion
6
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
7
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
8
Masjid Millati Ibraheem

Religious

Religion
9
International Institute of Islamic Medicine

International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

Human Services
10
Al-Mawrid United States Inc

The Organization is a foundation for Islamic research and education.

Religion
11
Darul-Uloom Islamic Center

Darul Uloom is a nonprofit Islamic center that has been formed exclusively for educational and religious purposes. The center plays vital role in the lives of Muslims in the East of Saint Paul, Minnesota. The center is a place where…

Education
12
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cair-Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dallas Islamic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SERVING HUMANITY: $450,400 · OtherSERVING HUMANITYADAMS CENTER: $67,230 · OtherADAMS CENTERISLAMIC SOCIETY OF CLINTON: $41,500 · OtherISLAMIC SOCIETY OF CLINTON+36 more: $195,660 · Other+36 moreCelebrateMercy: $7,558 · ReligionBartlesville Islamic Center Inc: $6,000 · ReligionDALLAS ISLAMIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · ReligionMASJID NOOR UL HUDA: $4,000 · ReligionISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $10,958 · InternationalBEHBUD USA: $5,000 · Human ServicesIndian Muslim Relief and Charities: $1,100 · Human ServicesCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $2,600 · Civil RightsMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $2,500 · Civil Rights+1 more: $20 · Civil RightsMIDWEST LUMBER MUSEUM INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureMERCY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$754,790Religion$22,558International$10,958Human Services$6,100Civil Rights$5,120Arts & Culture$4,500Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $10,958 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCelebrateMercy: $7,558 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBartlesville Islamic Center Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUnited Care International: $5,500 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetDALLAS ISLAMIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMIDWEST LUMBER MUSEUM INC: $4,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCGH Health Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMERCY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $2,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndian Muslim Relief and Charities: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
  • Who funds CelebrateMercy ↗
  • Who funds Bartlesville Islamic Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds United Care International ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ISLAMIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEHBUD USA ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST LUMBER MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MASJID NOOR UL HUDA ↗
  • Who funds CGH Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mumtaz FoundationSC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mumtaz Foundation · Amin & Rubina Chikhalia Foundation · Haque Family Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · Texas Instruments Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rasheed Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rasheed Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rasheed Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph