· Private foundation
Rasheed Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $77k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SERVING HUMANITY | $45,000 |
| ADAMS CENTER | $32,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| BEHBUD USA | $5,000 |
| WMCIR | $4,000 |
| CGH HEALTH FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| DALLAS ISLAMIC FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| ISLAMIC CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES | $3,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE OPEN DOOR FOOD PANTRY | $3,000 |
| ICNA RELIEF USA | $3,000 |
| DAR AL-HIJRAH ISLAMIC CENTER | $3,000 |
| MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES | $2,800 |
| HELPING HANDS USA | $2,155 |
| MUSLIM STUDENTS FOR RELIEF | $2,000 |
| ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF CLINTON | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRISLAMIC RELIEF USA6× · 2018–2023 · $11k · revenue +38%
- CCelebrateMercy2× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +31%
- UCUnited Care International9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
- ICISLAMIC CENTER OF MACOMBone grant, 2022 · $10k
- RRRIYO RAAC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Human Rights Project
The mission of Masjidullah is to establish the Holy Qur'an as the guide book for all of humanity and the life of prophet Muhammad as the example for human conduct. Masjidullah carries out its mission through programs of community service…
The advancement of Religion and the elimination of prejudice and discrimination based on religious beliefs
Religious
International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application
The Organization is a foundation for Islamic research and education.
Darul Uloom is a nonprofit Islamic center that has been formed exclusively for educational and religious purposes. The center plays vital role in the lives of Muslims in the East of Saint Paul, Minnesota. The center is a place where…
Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cair-Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dallas Islamic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds CelebrateMercy ↗
- Who funds Bartlesville Islamic Center Inc ↗
- Who funds United Care International ↗
- Who funds BEHBUD USA ↗
- Who funds DALLAS ISLAMIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST LUMBER MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds MASJID NOOR UL HUDA ↗
- Who funds MERCY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CGH Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mumtaz Foundation · Amin & Rubina Chikhalia Foundation · Haque Family Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · Texas Instruments Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rasheed Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.