How much did RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND grant in FY2025?

RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND reported 11 grants totaling $1,299,250 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND based?

RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND is based in MN.

RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND

The mission of the organization is to support the cancer community in minnesota by funding research, prevention, treatment and community outreach programs relating to cancer.

$1.3M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$1.0M

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

facilityrespiteeducationchildren

2020

immunotherapyleukemiadevelop novelcellneurotoxicitypancreaticsystem

2021

healthpatientseducation

2022

educationpatients

2023

lovedpatients

2024

patients

2025

veinpaid camppatientcarecamp kids

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k7 grants · $105k
$50k–250k2 grants · $138k
$250k+1 grant · $1.0M

$14,600

Median grant

States reached

$353k

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$1,044,518
MAYO CLINIC$80,000
MINNESOTA FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION$57,750
INDY FOUNDATION$25,000
CAMP BREAKAWAY$22,100
JA WEDUM HOSPICE$14,600
QUIET OAKS HOUSE & RESPITE CARE$13,000
CENTRACARE HEALTH SYSTEM$10,000
CAMP KESEM - UNIVERSITY OF MN$10,000
ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
BREAST CANCER EDUCATION FOUNDATION$7,400

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $149k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.3M · 17 repeat orgs$983k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.3M

$970k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%

+67%

Still filing today

82%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
MAYO CLINIC - DR HADDAD
5× · 2018–2025 · $270k · revenue +29%
IF
INDY FOUNDATION - SAUK RAPIDS
7× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +295%
CB
CAMP BREAKAWAY
3× · 2023–2025 · $63k · revenue +1859% · 86% of their budget

Funded once

UO
UNIVERSITY OF MN DULUTH - DR MEREDDYgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $831k · revenue +67%
CQ
CAMP QUALITY MINNESOTAgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue +73%
SH
SANFORD HEALTH - BEMIDJIgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Avera Health

Promotion of health

Health

Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health

Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

To improve the cardiovascular health of individuals and communities through research & education.

Health

Swedish Covenant Health

Swedish Covenant Health follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

—

SwedishAmerican Hospital

Through excellence in healthcare and compassionate service, we care for our community.

Health

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Nccn is dedicated to improving and facilitating quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care so all patients can live better lives.

Health

MaineHealth

MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…

Health

Adventist Midwest Health

The provision of medical care to the community through the operation of two hospitals.

Health

MinnPost

MinnPost produces independent journalism to serve as a trusted guide for Minnesotans exploring the critical issues, challenges and opportunities facing our state.

Arts & Culture

Md Anderson Foundation

Philanthropy

Dakota Medical Foundation

We lead initiatives to create a region of the healthiest people, build the fundraising success of charities, and invest in new ideas that create widespread health improvement.

Health

H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research

To promote and support h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute, inc. and its subs.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ja Wedum Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/23

Grantees still filing

20/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,450,998Education$830,520Health$690,036Human Services$148,802Philanthropy$119,971Public Benefit$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN17.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CAMP BREAKAWAY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~21 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 19.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 862226354 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CAMP BREAKAWAY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 21 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 86% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Randy Shaver Cancer Research And?

Find your warmest path to Randy Shaver Cancer Research And through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Randy Shaver Cancer Research And?

More from the funding graph

RANDY SHAVER CANCER RESEARCH AND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Randy Shaver Cancer Research And?

More from the funding graph