Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ralla Klepak Performing Arts Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$9.5MReligion$2.9MEducation$2.0MHuman Services$1.5MHealth$985kSocial Science$897kCivil Rights$525kYouth Development$227kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $739k
  • $250k+8 grants · $4.1M
$250,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Merit School of Music$1,050,000
Individual grant recipient$550,000
Individual grant recipient$536,000
The Ark$500,000
The Chicago Center for Music Educat$500,000
Individual grant recipient$450,000
Agudath Israel of Chicago$250,000
Arie Crown Hebrew Day School$250,000
Individual grant recipient$225,000
The People's Music School$150,000
Individual grant recipient$138,600
Harold and Rosemarie Marx Memorial$100,000
Playthinks$75,000
Joy Christian Fellowship Church$50,000
Mesameach$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Center on Halsted: $150k → 14%Center on Halsted: $105k → 14%Center on Halsted: $105k → 14%Center on Halsted: $50k → 14%Metropolitan Family Services: $150k → 14%Metropolitan Family Services: $100k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $340k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $336k → 14%Chicago Chesed Fund: $29k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 41 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
20

Total granted

$22M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+10%

Still filing today

41%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $825k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue ×16
  • NT
    NORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +128%
  • ST
    STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $750k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • SH
    Sarah Hartman Institute
    one grant, 2024 · $500k
  • IC
    IDA Crown Academy
    one grant, 2023 · $165k
  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago City Theatre Company dba Joel Hall Dancers & Center

To enrich the lives of our community through dance education and performance while developing Chicago's native talent pool in a welcoming environment that celebrates multiculturalism & ethnic diversity.

Arts & Culture
2
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
3
Chamber Opera of Chicago
4
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
5
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
6
Chicago Jazz Philharmonic

To present high quality arts programming and musical performances that will educate, enrich and improve the quality of life for the diverse Chicago cultural communities and beyond.

7
Lookingglass Theatre Company

Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…

Arts & Culture
8
Porchlight Music Theatre Chicago

Porchlight, Chicagos home for music theatre, illuminates the past, present and future of this American art form through live performance, youth education and outreach programs that positively impact and connect us to the community.

Arts & Culture
9
Cyt Chicago Inc

CYT is dedicated to developing character in children and adults through training in the arts and by producing whole family entertainment, all of which reflect Judeo-Christian values.

Arts & Culture
10
The Ballet Chicago Company

Ballet Chicago is a professional track school of ballet that creates exceptional dancers. It makes classical ballet training accessible to all. Its founders Daniel Duell and Patricia Blair carry on George Balanchines legacy by providing…

11
Writers Theatre Inc

Writers Theatre (WT) is a literary organization that operates not-for-profit theatres in Glencoe, Illinois. The Writers Theatre mission is to create intimate connections through astonishing performances and innovative programs; activating…

Arts & Culture
12
Chicago Sinfonietta Inc

Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Children's Theatre and the most unlike its peers is Firehouse Community Arts Center of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%7%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr15%28%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%5%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%6%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr15%51%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/30
the rest of the field
16%
5,000/31,480

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $2,136,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Ark — $1,275,000 · OtherThe ArkIndividual grant recipient — $1,210,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJDBY — $900,000 · OtherJDBYAgudath Israel of Chicago — $863,000 · OtherAgudath Israel of ChicagoThe Chicago Center for Music Educat — $775,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $750,000 · OtherWesleyan University of Illinois — $685,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $550,000 · Other+35 more — $6,496,200 · Other+35 moreMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $2,050,000 · Arts & CultureMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSICNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC — $1,265,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INCSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY — $750,000 · Arts & CultureSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANYRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $665,000 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATIONCHICAGO CHILDREN'S THEATRE — $585,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO CHILDREN'S THEATRETIMELESS GIFTS — $475,000 · Arts & CultureTIMELESS GIFTSKUUMBA LYNX — $300,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG CHICAGO AUTHORS — $280,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $559,500 · Arts & Culture+6 moreCHICAGO CHESED FUND — $704,425 · Human ServicesCenter on Halsted — $410,000 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family Services — $250,000 · Human ServicesCHANGING WORLDS — $325,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $200,000 · Civil RightsMESIVTA SHAAREI ADIRIM — $200,000 · EducationGLENWOOD ACADEMY — $96,500 · Education
Other$15,640,800Arts & Culture$6,929,500Human Services$1,364,425Civil Rights$525,000Education$296,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $2,050,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC — $1,265,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY — $750,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCHICAGO CHESED FUND — $704,425 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $665,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGO CHILDREN'S THEATRE — $585,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetTIMELESS GIFTS — $475,000 over 4y, 73% of budgetCenter on Halsted — $410,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTapestry 360 Health — $400,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHANGING WORLDS — $325,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetKUUMBA LYNX — $300,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSearch Inc — $280,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG CHICAGO AUTHORS — $280,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services — $250,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLUBAVITCH GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL INC — $155,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetThe People's Music School — $150,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetVANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC — $105,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNational Indo American Museum — $101,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetCENTRO ROMERO — $100,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetVictory Gardens Theater — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY — $96,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLawrence Hall — $76,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTIZMORET INC — $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFIREHOUSE COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER OF CHICAGO — $41,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC
  • Who funds NORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC
  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHESED FUND
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHILDREN'S THEATRE
  • Who funds TIMELESS GIFTS
  • Who funds Center on Halsted
  • Who funds Tapestry 360 Health
  • Who funds CHANGING WORLDS
  • Who funds KUUMBA LYNX
  • Who funds Search Inc
  • Who funds YOUNG CHICAGO AUTHORS
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services
  • Who funds MESIVTA SHAAREI ADIRIM
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds LUBAVITCH GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Polk Bros Foundation IncIL25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Field Foundation of Illinois · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Illinois Humanities Council Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Prince Foundation · League of Chicago Theatres Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ralla Klepak Performing Arts Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph