Skip to content
RADLER FOUNDATION for INNOVATION and EDUCATION INC at a glance

· Private foundation

RADLER FOUNDATION for INNOVATION and EDUCATION INC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Philanthropy$24kEnvironment$24kArts & Culture$12kHealth$7kHousing & Shelter$7kReligion$2kEducation$1kCivil Rights$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$760k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
From The Heart Productions$10,000
Friends of Boerner Botanical Gardens$5,000
American Rose Society$5,000
Planned Parenthood$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
UWM Arboretum Logenecker Gardens$1,000
G L Community Fund$300
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation$300
Lambda Legal$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%From The Heart Productions: $10k → 10%The Garden Conservancy: $500 → 6%American Cancer Society: $250 → 5%Greater Milwaukee Rose Society: $500 → 10%WI Public Radio Assn: $250 → 10%The Guest House of Milwaukee: $250 → 17%Chicago Horticultural Society: $250 → 14%Bright Focus Fdn: $250 → 8%Garden Conservancy: $500 → 6%American Cancer Society: $250 → 5%Greater Milwaukee Rose Society: $500 → 10%Wisconsin Public Radio Assoc Inc: $250 → 10%The Guest House of Milwaukee: $250 → 17%Chicago Horticultural Society: $250 → 14%Bright Focus Foundation: $250 → 8%UWM Arboretum Logenecker Gardens: $1k → 10%Friends of Boerner Botanical Gardens: $5k → 17%Lambda Legal: $300 → 14%University of Wisconsin - Madison: $1k → 10%Emanuel United Church of Christ: $1k → 17%UW Madison (Longenecker Gardens): $1k → 10%Emanuel United Church of Christ: $625 → 17%Planned Parenthood: $2k → 17%Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin: $500 → 17%Planned Parenthood of WI: $500 → 17%American Civil Liberties Union Foundation: $300 → 17%American Civil Liberties Union: $250 → 17%American Civil Liberties Union of Wisc Foundation: $250 → 17%Cream City Foundation: $24k → 17%Diverse & Resilient: $2k → 17%Diverse & Resilient: $2k → 17%Historic Haymarket Milwaukee: $100 → 17%Holton Street Clinic: $50 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 9 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$26k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+28%

Still filing today

78%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STREET ANGELS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +55%
  • DIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +13%
  • TG
    THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • EU
    Emanuel United Church of Christ
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • UM
    UW Madison (Longenecker Gardens)
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • UO
    University of Wisconsin - Madison
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
3
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
4
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
5
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
6
Milwaukee Public Museum Inc

The milwaukee public museum inspires curiosity, excites minds and increases desire to preserve and protect our world's natural and cultural diversity through exhibitions, educational programs, collections and research.

Arts & Culture
7
Olbrich Botanical Society Inc

Olbrich botanical gardens enriches lives and inspires people to live in harmony with the natural world. olbrich botanical gardens is dedicated to the creation, conservation, and interpretation of gardens and plant collections hardy to the…

Environment
8
Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin Inc

Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.

—
9
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
10
Wisconsin Broadcasters Association Inc

The purpose of the wisconsin broadcasters association shall be to foster and promote the development of the arts of aural and visual broadcasting in all its forms; to protect its members in every lawful and proper manner from injustices…

Community Improvement
11
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
12
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cream City Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brightfocus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CREAM CITY FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 · PhilanthropyCREAM CITY FOUNDATION INCAMERICAN ROSE SOCIETY: $14,500 · EnvironmentAMERICAN ROSE SOCIETYTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY …+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentFrom The Heart Productions: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFrom The Heart Product…FRIENDS OF BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF BOERNER BOT…+2 more: $350 · Arts & CultureIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…Planned Parenthood: $2,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodEmanuel United Church of Christ: $1,725 · OtherEmanuel United Chu…UW Madison (Longenecker Gardens): $1,000 · OtherUW Madison (Longen…UWM Arboretum Logenecker Gardens: $1,000 · OtherUWM Arboretum Loge…University of Wisconsin - Madison: $1,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisc…GREATER MILWAUKEE ROSE SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · OtherGREATER MILWAUKEE …Milwaukee Area Tech College End: $500 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of WI: $500 · OtherAmerican Cancer Society: $500 · Other+7 more: $1,700 · Other+7 moreSTREET ANGELS INC: $4,250 · Human ServicesDIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC: $3,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $500 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $500 · EducationThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$24,000Environment$16,000Arts & Culture$15,350Other$12,925Human Services$4,250Health$4,000Education$500Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCREAM CITY FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN ROSE SOCIETY: $14,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSTREET ANGELS INC: $4,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WISCONSIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLTON STREET CLINIC INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Fou…Baird Foundation IncUnited Way of Greater…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization RADLER FOUNDATION for INNOVATION and EDUCATION INC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from RADLER FOUNDATION for INNOVATION and EDUCATION INC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to RADLER FOUNDATION for INNOVATION and EDUCATION INC?

    Find your warmest path to RADLER FOUNDATION for INNOVATION and EDUCATION INC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on RADLER FOUNDATION for INNOVATION and EDUCATION’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home