Wisconsin · Nonprofit
Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc
Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc (Wisconsin) receives grants from 54 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,891,277 to it, the largest being PUELICHER FOUNDATION INC AGY ($2,318,000). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc has grown faster than three-quarters of the 501 arts & culture nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 501 arts & culture nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Incshared funderslocal
- Wisconsin Humanities Council Incportfolio match
- Barbara Meyer Elsner Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2022 1% · 2023 7% · 2024 14% · 2025 84%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (58% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 25 funders, grant income rose $355k → $5.3M.
9 of 54 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
Left out of every figure on this page: $5.8M from 5 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc raised.
From the IRS filings of Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 54 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 13% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 70% · 2022 16% · 2023 40% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
93% of Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc's grant income comes from Wisconsin funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.9M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 54 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Incshared funderslocalWI · backs 59 organizations that share your funders · funds 86 organizations near you
- Wisconsin Humanities Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Barbara Meyer Elsner Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Maryland Historical Society Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Nast Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Jeffris Family Foundation Ltdportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Indiana Humanities Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Minnesota Historical Societyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United Statesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Brewers Community Foundation Incshared funderslocalWI · backs 68 organizations that share your funders · funds 97 organizations near you
- Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitableshared funderslocalWI · backs 75 organizations that share your funders · funds 86 organizations near you
- Alvin a Marion Birnschein Foundation Incshared fundersWI · backs 34 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Wisconsin
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
100% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
0%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc?
- Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc (Wisconsin) receives grants from 54 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,891,277 to it, the largest being PUELICHER FOUNDATION INC AGY ($2,318,000). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc have?
- IRS filings report 54 organizations giving $17,891,277 in grants to Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc, 25 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc?
- PUELICHER FOUNDATION INC AGY is the largest funder on record, with $2,318,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 54funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing