Skip to content

· Private foundation

R Schindler Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$96kHuman Services$40kCrime & Legal$5kEducation$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$460k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY$7,000
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN$5,000
THE GATHERING PLACE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN$4,000
CURATIVE CONNECTIONS$4,000
NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC$3,000
ADRC OF BROWN COUNTY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%LUTHERAN COUNSELING & FAMILY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$156k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$156k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+48%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEmploymentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GATHERING PLACE INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +3%
  • EF
    Epilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +1%
  • NC
    NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MH
    Mental Health America of Greater Houston Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -4%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +48%
  • FH
    FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waubonsie Mental Health Center

Waubonsie mental health center serves to promote and enhance community mental health values and to provide responsive and accessible mental health services and service coordination to the individuals who reside in fremont, montgomery, and…

Health
2
Open Hearts Family Wellness

Open hearts provides comprehensive mental health services in coordination with medical providers. the services are medically necessary with specific diagnosis and treatment to reduce symptoms,prevent illness, and increase quality of life.

Human Services
3
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
4
Grace Counseling Inc

To provide counseling, psychiatric, educational and consultation services to individuals, families, churches, religious organizations and businesses. grace counseling, inc. is a christian counseling center offering excellence in a full…

Health
5
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
6
Alternative Paths Inc

Provide an array of quality behavioral healthcare services designed to meet the needs of residents of medina county and surrounding areas.

Health
7
Walk-in Counseling Center Inc

We provide free, anonymous mental health counseling to anyone with an urgent need and few resources, all by clinically trained volunteer counselors, team consultants and by receptionists.

Health
8
Comprehensive Behavioral Health Center of St Clair County Inc

To provide services to qualified persons in need of mental health care and alcohol and substance abuse counseling in the st. clair county illinois area, including residential assistance for the community.

Health
9
The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services

La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.

—
10
Community Counseling Centers of Chicago Inc

To Provide counseling, crisis intervention, case management, psychosocial rehabilitative and vocational services to mentally ill and substance abuse clients in outpatient and community based settings.

Health
11
North Central Mental Health Services Inc

To provide mental health and drug addiction services.

Health
12
Community Guidance Clinic for Central Connecticut Inc

Community guidance clinic for central connecticut, an established and trusted community resource, provides comprehensive evidence-based behavioral health services that promote wellness and resilience. our collaborative, family-focused,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Curative Connections Inc; the most unlike its peers is Epilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN: $25,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S WISCONSINIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD: $14,000 · OtherNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTDCP: $11,000 · OtherCPHOUSE OF HOPE: $9,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HOPEADRC OF BROWN COUNTY: $5,000 · OtherADRC OF BROWN COUNTYCENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INC: $3,000 · Other+2 more: $2,650 · OtherBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC: $18,000 · HealthBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INCTHE GATHERING PLACE INC: $16,000 · HealthTHE GATHERING PLACE INCEpilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin Inc: $15,000 · HealthEpilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin In…Mental Health America of Greater Houston Inc: $5,000 · HealthMental Health America of Greater Ho…CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $28,000 · EmploymentCURATIVE CONNECTIO…FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterLUTHERAN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$84,650Health$54,000Employment$28,000Housing & Shelter$2,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $28,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC: $18,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE INC: $16,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetEpilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMental Health America of Greater Houston Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLUTHERAN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Epilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health America of Greater Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Catherine E Apple & Myrl S Apple Family Foundation Inc · Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002 · K C Stock Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R Schindler Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R Schindler Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on R Schindler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph