· Private foundation
R Schindler Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY | $7,000 |
| THE GATHERING PLACE | $5,000 |
| EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| CURATIVE CONNECTIONS | $4,000 |
| NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC | $3,000 |
| ADRC OF BROWN COUNTY | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGTHE GATHERING PLACE INC5× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +3%
- EFEpilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +1%
- NCNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- MHMental Health America of Greater Houston Incone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -4%
- CFCENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +48%
- FHFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Waubonsie mental health center serves to promote and enhance community mental health values and to provide responsive and accessible mental health services and service coordination to the individuals who reside in fremont, montgomery, and…
Open hearts provides comprehensive mental health services in coordination with medical providers. the services are medically necessary with specific diagnosis and treatment to reduce symptoms,prevent illness, and increase quality of life.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
To provide counseling, psychiatric, educational and consultation services to individuals, families, churches, religious organizations and businesses. grace counseling, inc. is a christian counseling center offering excellence in a full…
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
Provide an array of quality behavioral healthcare services designed to meet the needs of residents of medina county and surrounding areas.
We provide free, anonymous mental health counseling to anyone with an urgent need and few resources, all by clinically trained volunteer counselors, team consultants and by receptionists.
To provide services to qualified persons in need of mental health care and alcohol and substance abuse counseling in the st. clair county illinois area, including residential assistance for the community.
La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.
To Provide counseling, crisis intervention, case management, psychosocial rehabilitative and vocational services to mentally ill and substance abuse clients in outpatient and community based settings.
To provide mental health and drug addiction services.
Community guidance clinic for central connecticut, an established and trusted community resource, provides comprehensive evidence-based behavioral health services that promote wellness and resilience. our collaborative, family-focused,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Curative Connections Inc and the most unlike its peers is Epilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds BRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Epilepsy Foundation of Wisconsin Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD ↗
- Who funds Mental Health America of Greater Houston Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Catherine E Apple & Myrl S Apple Family Foundation Inc · Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002 · K C Stock Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization R Schindler Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.